Friday, October 14, 2005

On 9/11, even US Marshals said there were bombs in the buildings

NY Times, 9/11 oral history archive; see Hoppey, Timothy-- firefighter, page 13:

"But a cop started screaming, "The north tower is leaning." We again started running. That came down a couple minutes after that. As I said, I think we were on Vesey Street at that point, but I’m not really sure.

After that it was kind of pandemonium. The U.S. marshals were saying a third plane was coming in. They said there were bombs in all the buildings around there."


This takes place shortly after the south tower collapsed.

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Articles Using the Speed of the Twin Towers Collapse as Proof of Controlled Demolition

Jerry Russel (MS in Engineering):
As your eyes will tell you, the World Trade Center collapses looked like controlled demolitions. Here's the proof.

The proof. According to the law of gravity, it is possible to calculate the time it takes for an object to fall a given distance. The equation is H=(1/2)at2, where H is the height, a is the acceleration of gravity (10 meters per second squared) and t is time in seconds. Plug in the height of the building at 1350 feet (411 meters) and we get 9 seconds. That is just about the length of time it took for the very top of the World Trade Center to fall to the street below. According to all reports, the whole thing was over in just about ten seconds.

It is as if the entire building were falling straight down through thin air. As if the entire solid structure below, the strong part which had not been burned or sliced or harmed in any significant way, just disappeared into nothingness. Yet this (within a small tolerance) is what we would expect to find if there had been a controlled demolition, because the explosions below really do leave the upper stories completely unsupported. Like the Road Runner after he runs off the edge of the cliff, the entire building pauses a moment, then goes straight down.

Any kind of viscous process or friction process should have slowed the whole thing down. Like dropping a lead ball into a vat of molasses, or dropping a feather into the air, gravitational acceleration cannot achieve its full effect if it is fighting any opposing force. In the case of the World Trade Center, the intact building below should have at least braked the fall of the upper stories. This did not happen. There was no measurable friction at all.

This proves controlled demolition.


Here's the other article using the same type of argument.

Friday, September 30, 2005

Experiment of the Day

Fill a large steel pot with a few bricks so it weighs twenty pounds or so, then put it on a grill composed of two hundred wires from wire coat hangers. Have 160 of the wires on the outside but have 40 wires on the interior also supporting the grill. Put a wire and asbestos pad on top of the wires to act as a floor. Now, cut twenty of the outside wires on one side, ten on the inside on the same side and build a pyre out of sticks and newspaper under the pot, soak it with some kerosene then light it. Now see what happens.

Will the pot--

a) suddenly fall stright down as the all wires heat up, weaken and give way at once?

b) will some of the wires weaken and the grill will sag on one side and then slowly droop down into the fire?

c) will the wires hold the weight of the pot just fine until the fire burns out?

I am guessing that it will be (c) or maybe (b), but (a) seems very doubtful.

Thursday, September 29, 2005

Why the Upper Section of the South Tower Disintegrated So Rapidly--

rather than falling as a large chunk of building.

I always thought the way the large upper section of WTC2 just turned into dust early on in the collapse of the building was odd.

This thirty story section of the tower was essentially undamaged, yet early on in the collapse, it started tilting and twisting and falling, then the part of the building below this section starts collapsing. Before the collapse proceeds very far though, the upper section disintegrates into dust.

Now how on earth can the upper part of the building drive the collapse if it is also turning into a huge dust cloud?

In any case, here is a picture from an angle I hadn't seen before, showing the top of WTC2 just tilting. At the same time, there are multiple explosive squibs coming out the west face of this upper section.

Thus, this shows fairly clearly why the upper section turned to dust. This is unequivocal evidence for controlled demolition, in my opinion. Massive controlled demolition.


Early moment during the collapse of the South tower-- note multiple explosive jets coming out of the upper tilting section. Posted by Picasa

p.s. here is the video from which it looks like that still was taken.

Controlled Demoltion of the World Trade Center

This blog will deal with the collapse of the world trade center buildings 1, 2 and 7 on 9/11/01, and in particular will focus on the idea that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition.

Thursday, March 20, 2003

Online Store



Online store presents a lot of goods are sold from various types of goods from mobile-phones/handphones/cellphones, used books, fashion accessories, animals, shoes, and assorted other items present here(phen Site) is now.

Also provide convenience for us all in need of a good to be able to look here and match as needed Preferred.




Phen Site Collection:
>> PAUL SMITH - SHOES
>> ZARA - SHOES
>> MACBETH - SHOES
>> SPYDERBILT - SHOES
>> LEOPARD GECKO
>> MEN - WALLET
>> MP3 - THE KUBE
>> SEQUIN CLUTCH BAG - NEW ARRIVAL - imported from Korea
>> The ultimate Chanel Replica Handbags Collection
>> MIU MIU handbags

Can also visit :
------> the Online Mini Market to the needs of women
and
------> the Phen Site Collection



Please see product catalog phen Site, if you want to order online please contact our support.

Format for Booking Type:
Discount Code#Name#Address + City + Province#Category Items ordered#Name Product#Phone Number who can be contacted

and send to our online support.


Shipping performed via JNE.