When CNN Comes to Town

CNN and Soledad O'Brien once again puts Murfreesboro Tennessee in the spotlight with more on the mosque debate/diversion/psyops with a Sunday night, March 27 showing of  "Unwelcome: The Muslims Next Door."  

"We focused on both sides," said CNN's Soledad. 

I doubt that Soledad will put very much focus on who funded the court action against building the mosque. Connecting the dots in this divide and conquer saga reveals zionist necon manipulations. Frank Gaffney and the Center for Security Policy played a role. 'Christian' zionist groups chipped in. I'm sure other zionist led organizations had a hidden hand in the money and maneuverings but kept a very low profile. The mosque opposition lawyers refused to talk about who is paying them.

CNN even has an "educator and student guide" with before and after viewing discussion questions. No questions though on how this story is a classic example of social engineering and manufactured enemies for neverending war.

In her interviews with the duped and disturbed mosque and Muslim opponents, Soledad  passed on the opportunity to ask them these questions ...

Don't you folks know that 9/11 was a false flag orchestrated by criminal elements of the U.S. government and the Israeli Mossad with great assistance from all of the main stream media in the deception and cover-up, including my very own CNN? Why can't you understand that it wasn't Muslims that attacked us, that it was an 'inside job?' Doesn't that make your Islamophobia and mosque opposition a moot point?

Soledad likes her job so she won't deviate from the official line  Contrived sensationalism sells. It's what Soledad and CNN do.

More background on the Murfreesboro mosque story.

-------------

The complete CNN video ... part 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4

When CNN Comes to Town

CNN and Soledad O'Brien once again puts Murfreesboro Tennessee in the spotlight with more on the mosque debate/diversion/psyops with a Sunday night, March 27 showing of  "Unwelcome: The Muslims Next Door."  

"We focused on both sides," said CNN's Soledad. 

I doubt that Soledad will put very much focus on who funded the court action against building the mosque. Connecting the dots in this divide and conquer saga reveals zionist necon manipulations. Frank Gaffney and the Center for Security Policy played a role. 'Christian' zionist groups chipped in. I'm sure other zionist led organizations had a hidden hand in the money and maneuverings but kept a very low profile. The mosque opposition lawyers refused to talk about who is paying them.

CNN even has an "educator and student guide" with before and after viewing discussion questions. No questions though on how this story is a classic example of social engineering and manufactured enemies for neverending war.

In her interviews with the duped and disturbed mosque and Muslim opponents, Soledad  passed on the opportunity to ask them these questions ...

Don't you folks know that 9/11 was a false flag orchestrated by criminal elements of the U.S. government and the Israeli Mossad with great assistance from all of the main stream media in the deception and cover-up, including my very own CNN? Why can't you understand that it wasn't Muslims that attacked us, that it was an 'inside job?' Doesn't that make your Islamophobia and mosque opposition a moot point?

Soledad likes her job so she won't deviate from the official line  Contrived sensationalism sells. It's what Soledad and CNN do.

More background on the Murfreesboro mosque story.

-------------

The complete CNN video ... part 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4

And now back to our regularly scheduled dangerous vitriolic rhetoric

It seems like the terms vitriol and vitriolic have been used more in the last 3 days than in the rest of history combined. Perhaps that's an exaggeration but you know the media, once a word catches on it is used repetitively until we're sick of it. Sort of like anti-semetism.

Everyone with a political axe to grind or a propaganda angle to push is trying to make use of the Gabrielle Giffords mass shooting. Blame this one or that, words incite, words can kill. We've heard it all before but this event really gives an opportunity to push the envelope for censorship and more. In the end this is not about quieting the controlled left/right politicians, their media shills and misguided followers. It is about shutting us up ... you and I.

Already there's a call to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.

Just how specific would that law be and who would have the say so on what inciting violence is? Would violence actually have to occur or would this be more in the realm of 'thought crime?'

Would calling Joe Lieberman a traitor, Lindsey Graham a war whore or questioning that a majority of Congress are controlled or blackmailed by AIPAC, Wall Street and the mega-corporations be inciting? How about saying that the entire Congress and many federal officials are complicit in covering up the 9/11 black op? It could be dangerous just talking about how the Congress and federal officials have blood on their hands for allowing the lying wars to continue or how they get on their knees waving tons of money before Israel and supporting the genocide and land theft of Palestine. Words could trigger loons to act and it would be all your fault.

Mostly it's about inciting fear. Fear to speak out. Fear to call those in power the applicable names they so well deserve. Fear to try and expose the criminal activities in government.

It's not about the "in the crosshairs" symbols of Sara Palin. It's about the symbolism of "we" who are dangerous because we ask the questions.

The traitor of the day award goes to Glenn Beck who amazingly uses the Giffords incident to lead into how he's always been right and who is number one on his list of people with dangerous thoughts ... truthers.

Yes, number 1 in his "A Recipe for Danger."

"I have told you on this program that we are facing a danger and I, on this program, have highlighted certain things. I've told you that there are people out there that I think are dangerous that actually believe that 9/11 was an inside job and that George Bush was responsible for wiring it up and blowing up the world trade center. I think some of those people are nuts.


I think some of them are dangerous.


I have told you that the government would so discredit themselves that those things would start to make more and more sense and people would say, you know what, I don't even know if I believe in the moon landing anymore."

I was surprised that Beck didn't equate truthers with holocaust deniers but he did throw in these other gems; "He {Jared Loughner} thinks George Bush was behind 9/11,"   "19 hijackers who took down the world trade center in the name of Allah,"   "My agenda is the truth."

transparent bullshit ...

vitriolic rhetoric ...

It makes you want to get up and smack the TV.

And now back to our regularly scheduled dangerous vitriolic rhetoric

It seems like the terms vitriol and vitriolic have been used more in the last 3 days than in the rest of history combined. Perhaps that's an exaggeration but you know the media, once a word catches on it is used repetitively until we're sick of it. Sort of like anti-semetism.

Everyone with a political axe to grind or a propaganda angle to push is trying to make use of the Gabrielle Giffords mass shooting. Blame this one or that, words incite, words can kill. We've heard it all before but this event really gives an opportunity to push the envelope for censorship and more. In the end this is not about quieting the controlled left/right politicians, their media shills and misguided followers. It is about shutting us up ... you and I.

Already there's a call to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.

Just how specific would that law be and who would have the say so on what inciting violence is? Would violence actually have to occur or would this be more in the realm of 'thought crime?'

Would calling Joe Lieberman a traitor, Lindsey Graham a war whore or questioning that a majority of Congress are controlled or blackmailed by AIPAC, Wall Street and the mega-corporations be inciting? How about saying that the entire Congress and many federal officials are complicit in covering up the 9/11 black op? It could be dangerous just talking about how the Congress and federal officials have blood on their hands for allowing the lying wars to continue or how they get on their knees waving tons of money before Israel and supporting the genocide and land theft of Palestine. Words could trigger loons to act and it would be all your fault.

Mostly it's about inciting fear. Fear to speak out. Fear to call those in power the applicable names they so well deserve. Fear to try and expose the criminal activities in government.

It's not about the "in the crosshairs" symbols of Sara Palin. It's about the symbolism of "we" who are dangerous because we ask the questions.

The traitor of the day award goes to Glenn Beck who amazingly uses the Giffords incident to lead into how he's always been right and who is number one on his list of people with dangerous thoughts ... truthers.

Yes, number 1 in his "A Recipe for Danger."

"I have told you on this program that we are facing a danger and I, on this program, have highlighted certain things. I've told you that there are people out there that I think are dangerous that actually believe that 9/11 was an inside job and that George Bush was responsible for wiring it up and blowing up the world trade center. I think some of those people are nuts.


I think some of them are dangerous.


I have told you that the government would so discredit themselves that those things would start to make more and more sense and people would say, you know what, I don't even know if I believe in the moon landing anymore."

I was surprised that Beck didn't equate truthers with holocaust deniers but he did throw in these other gems; "He {Jared Loughner} thinks George Bush was behind 9/11,"   "19 hijackers who took down the world trade center in the name of Allah,"   "My agenda is the truth."

transparent bullshit ...

vitriolic rhetoric ...

It makes you want to get up and smack the TV.

Tripping with Al-Qaeda

For 9/11 week, HBO will premier Lawrence Wright's documentary exploration of modern terrorism "My Trip to Al-Qaeda."

Wright of course is an elitist shill for the 'official' tale of Al-Qaeda, radial Islam and 9/11 and the author of The Looming Tower : Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11.

Not having HBO I will probably never see this documentary and that's actually a good thing. No doubt it will be full of the same old lies that we have become accustomed to.

But it's interesting that sometimes in interviews even the best of the propaganda masters let things slip out that give insight to certain people and events.

NPR in promoting Wright and HBO's agenda had an interview with him where he had this to say about Osama Bin Laden's brother in law Jamal Khalifa.

TERRY GROSS: So, one of your best sources was bin Laden's brother-in-law, the late Jamal Khalifa. He was murdered or assassinated. And you say he understood bin Laden better than anyone. He had married bin Laden's favorite sister. What are some of the insights you got about bin Laden from talking to his brother-in-law?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, Jamal Khalifa was a delightful person. He had a wonderful, light sense of humor. He was always kidding. But at the same time, he was very earnest. And, you know, he had fought in the jihad with bin Laden. He was a high school teacher. You know, he had a very charismatic way about him.

And all these likeable qualities made me realize why bin Laden liked him. And in a way, through my own response to Jamal Khalifa, I could sort of identify an element of bin Laden's personality that actually it was a little uncomfortable to me because I could see the human side of al-Qaida. I could see why people might be drawn to bin Laden because of the nature of his friend.

GROSS: Did he defend jihad to you?

Mr. WRIGHT: He defended jihad against the Soviets. But he, not only to me but publicly, distanced himself from bin Laden, and he actually asked me if he could talk to the FBI to clear his name. And I said I knew a lot of FBI agents, and I would try to set that up.

So I did try and tried for actually several years. And I was finally told by a source that the FBI was forbidden by the CIA to actually make that contact with Jamal.

GROSS: Which side do you think killed him?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, his family thinks that U.S. Special Operations killed him, and I don't know that that's true. But nobody was arrested in that killing, and it was ostensibly a robbery, but all that was taken were his computers.{more}

So if what Wright says here is true, it seems as if Jamal was a CIA asset long after the Afgan-Soviet war, just like Osama was. The CIA couldn't have Jamal talking to the FBI. It might jeopardize their hidden operations so they killed him.

Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law, killed in Madagascar

"Khalifa was arrested in America, in Jordan, and after 9/11, in Saudi Arabia, and on each occasion was eventually released."

aangirfan: A History of Al Qaeda

Tripping with Al-Qaeda

For 9/11 week, HBO will premier Lawrence Wright's documentary exploration of modern terrorism "My Trip to Al-Qaeda."

Wright of course is an elitist shill for the 'official' tale of Al-Qaeda, radial Islam and 9/11 and the author of The Looming Tower : Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11.

Not having HBO I will probably never see this documentary and that's actually a good thing. No doubt it will be full of the same old lies that we have become accustomed to.

But it's interesting that sometimes in interviews even the best of the propaganda masters let things slip out that give insight to certain people and events.

NPR in promoting Wright and HBO's agenda had an interview with him where he had this to say about Osama Bin Laden's brother in law Jamal Khalifa.

TERRY GROSS: So, one of your best sources was bin Laden's brother-in-law, the late Jamal Khalifa. He was murdered or assassinated. And you say he understood bin Laden better than anyone. He had married bin Laden's favorite sister. What are some of the insights you got about bin Laden from talking to his brother-in-law?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, Jamal Khalifa was a delightful person. He had a wonderful, light sense of humor. He was always kidding. But at the same time, he was very earnest. And, you know, he had fought in the jihad with bin Laden. He was a high school teacher. You know, he had a very charismatic way about him.

And all these likeable qualities made me realize why bin Laden liked him. And in a way, through my own response to Jamal Khalifa, I could sort of identify an element of bin Laden's personality that actually it was a little uncomfortable to me because I could see the human side of al-Qaida. I could see why people might be drawn to bin Laden because of the nature of his friend.

GROSS: Did he defend jihad to you?

Mr. WRIGHT: He defended jihad against the Soviets. But he, not only to me but publicly, distanced himself from bin Laden, and he actually asked me if he could talk to the FBI to clear his name. And I said I knew a lot of FBI agents, and I would try to set that up.

So I did try and tried for actually several years. And I was finally told by a source that the FBI was forbidden by the CIA to actually make that contact with Jamal.

GROSS: Which side do you think killed him?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, his family thinks that U.S. Special Operations killed him, and I don't know that that's true. But nobody was arrested in that killing, and it was ostensibly a robbery, but all that was taken were his computers.{more}

So if what Wright says here is true, it seems as if Jamal was a CIA asset long after the Afgan-Soviet war, just like Osama was. The CIA couldn't have Jamal talking to the FBI. It might jeopardize their hidden operations so they killed him.

Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law, killed in Madagascar

"Khalifa was arrested in America, in Jordan, and after 9/11, in Saudi Arabia, and on each occasion was eventually released."

aangirfan: A History of Al Qaeda

Georgian TV Pulls a "War of the Worlds" Scam

Georgia's zionist pro-government Imedi TV creates a hoax that Russia has invaded them and that President Saakashvili is dead and causes a panic.

A test to gauge the potential of mass hysteria through media manipulation? Yes, it still works.

Orson Welles would be proud.

Also: Hoax News: Russia attacks Georgia, Saakashvili killed.

Georgian TV Pulls a "War of the Worlds" Scam

Georgia's zionist pro-government Imedi TV creates a hoax that Russia has invaded them and that President Saakashvili is dead and causes a panic.

A test to gauge the potential of mass hysteria through media manipulation? Yes, it still works.

Orson Welles would be proud.

Also: Hoax News: Russia attacks Georgia, Saakashvili killed.

Glenn Beck to Rick Perry ~ "Rick, I think you and I could French kiss right now."

Where some of the more 'normal' media whores would just high five their allies after they complete a hit on an opponent, Glenn Beck likes to talk about french kissing a partner in crime, Texas governor Rick (Friend of Zion - Mr. Mandatory HPV vaccine) Perry.

"He's a damn handsome man, looks good in a pair of jeans" Beck and his gay talking sidekick said.

I don't know much about Debra Medina, the republican alternative candidate for Texas governor running against Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison but she seems to be a libertarian, a states rights advocate and a good person. Considering her rivals, she is a welcome fresh face.  According to polls she was gaining ground. That is until today.

She made a big mistake and went on the Glenn Beck radio show. In an attempt to possibly gain some votes, I suppose she was just too naive to think that Beck, the Perry and Palin ass kisser, would be fair and objective and not have an agenda to shut her momentum down.

Early in the interview, Beck took intimidating jabs at Medina repeatedly asking her about her background in an attempt to throw her off balance. It was clear from the beginning that Beck had no intention in gathering information as he would not allow Medina to finish her sentences and clearly was not listening.

What became obvious later in the interview was the question that Beck was holding in the back of his mind which would score the necessary points the portly pundit craved. He then asked Medina if she was a "911 Truther". This was a clear attack on Medina's association with Ron Paul who has many followers who question the myriad of unsettling discrepancies regarding the events that took place on September 11, 2001. This was the perfect opportunity to relegate a viable grassroots candidate into the arena of "fringe".

Medina's answer was appropriate.

"I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn, so I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard, there are some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there, so I have not taken a position on that."

Perry must have been working with Beck because he immediately attacked Medina and twisted her words.

Gov. Rick Perry is dismissing a suggestion from a Republican primary rival that the U.S. government was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Perry said GOP candidate Debra Medina's remarks Thursday "were an insult to the thousands of Americans who lost loved ones."

Perry countered that anyone "should be ashamed" for suggesting the administration of former President George W. Bush played a role in the attacks. Bush was Perry's predecessor as Texas governor. 

The rest of the compliant media jumped all over the story. 

Then Medina makes another mistake. She issues a statement saying that she's not a 'truther' and proceeds to give the same old bullshit line, "Muslims did it." She should have left it alone.

I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.

Here's the last bit of her response to Beck's interview and it was all that she needed.

The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it's Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that's the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be. {source}

Beck and his cronies at Fox must still be laughing. They'll be back slapping and french kissing each other all night long as they revel in their power to earn their blood money by manipulating and crushing those who don't toe the neocon line.

What's really sad is that 9/11 was a government sponsored false flag and even the most well meaning politicians are scared to death of facing the truth and speaking out about it for fear of losing votes from the brain dead population.

Bye bye Debra ... we hardly knew you.

Glenn Beck to Rick Perry ~ "Rick, I think you and I could French kiss right now."

Where some of the more 'normal' media whores would just high five their allies after they complete a hit on an opponent, Glenn Beck likes to talk about french kissing a partner in crime, Texas governor Rick (Friend of Zion - Mr. Mandatory HPV vaccine) Perry.

"He's a damn handsome man, looks good in a pair of jeans" Beck and his gay talking sidekick said.

I don't know much about Debra Medina, the republican alternative candidate for Texas governor running against Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison but she seems to be a libertarian, a states rights advocate and a good person. Considering her rivals, she is a welcome fresh face.  According to polls she was gaining ground. That is until today.

She made a big mistake and went on the Glenn Beck radio show. In an attempt to possibly gain some votes, I suppose she was just too naive to think that Beck, the Perry and Palin ass kisser, would be fair and objective and not have an agenda to shut her momentum down.

Early in the interview, Beck took intimidating jabs at Medina repeatedly asking her about her background in an attempt to throw her off balance. It was clear from the beginning that Beck had no intention in gathering information as he would not allow Medina to finish her sentences and clearly was not listening.

What became obvious later in the interview was the question that Beck was holding in the back of his mind which would score the necessary points the portly pundit craved. He then asked Medina if she was a "911 Truther". This was a clear attack on Medina's association with Ron Paul who has many followers who question the myriad of unsettling discrepancies regarding the events that took place on September 11, 2001. This was the perfect opportunity to relegate a viable grassroots candidate into the arena of "fringe".

Medina's answer was appropriate.

"I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn, so I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard, there are some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there, so I have not taken a position on that."

Perry must have been working with Beck because he immediately attacked Medina and twisted her words.

Gov. Rick Perry is dismissing a suggestion from a Republican primary rival that the U.S. government was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Perry said GOP candidate Debra Medina's remarks Thursday "were an insult to the thousands of Americans who lost loved ones."

Perry countered that anyone "should be ashamed" for suggesting the administration of former President George W. Bush played a role in the attacks. Bush was Perry's predecessor as Texas governor. 

The rest of the compliant media jumped all over the story. 

Then Medina makes another mistake. She issues a statement saying that she's not a 'truther' and proceeds to give the same old bullshit line, "Muslims did it." She should have left it alone.

I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.

Here's the last bit of her response to Beck's interview and it was all that she needed.

The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it's Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that's the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be. {source}

Beck and his cronies at Fox must still be laughing. They'll be back slapping and french kissing each other all night long as they revel in their power to earn their blood money by manipulating and crushing those who don't toe the neocon line.

What's really sad is that 9/11 was a government sponsored false flag and even the most well meaning politicians are scared to death of facing the truth and speaking out about it for fear of losing votes from the brain dead population.

Bye bye Debra ... we hardly knew you.

This is a Street Brawl for Truth and Freedom

excerpt from Climategate: A Crime Against Humanity

by Mike Rivero

It is clear that government, the media, corporatized science, have quite literally bet the farm on selling the illusion of human cause global warming as justification for global taxes and global government. In order to bring about global government simultaneous with creating the illusion of a need they have to destroy the credibility of the regional governments and we have seen a great deal of this lately. Now the oligarchs face an awkward choice. They have set the stage for a collapse of the national governments and the global government they wish to install in its place may be collapsing right along with the myth of global government.

Various governments and the media are so heavily invested in selling the illusion of human cause global warming, that if that hoax is exposed, if the public becomes aware of the monstrous fraud involved, those institutions of government and media could very well be destroyed and by their own hands.

Already we are seeing the organizers and perpetrators of this fraud trying to limit the damage from this exposure in several ways. The media is already hard at work attempting to dump the blame and scandal solely on the climate scientists, who after all were only doing what they were paid to do. This is not to say the scientists are not guilty. Quite the contrary, they deserve to be pilloried publicly and humiliated for their betrayal of the public trust. To say that their careers should be ended is an understatement. But in our haste to punish the scientists who assisted in the lies to the world, we must not forget that the scientists were working for somebody; for politicians such as Al Gore, for an agenda called global government, and for those who wanted to get rich by selling is a fictitious product called carbon credit.

Yet another tactic being employed to limit the damage from climate gate, is to insist that even though the scientist responsible for the climate warming data have been exposed as holsters that the validity of the data itself must remain above question above reproach. This of course is nonsense. If you hire a contractor to build a home, and discover afterwards that the contractor has a history of using substandard materials and sloppy workmanship, do you continue to believe the home he has billed shoe is solid and durable and safe? Of course not. And yet the global warming cultists, are demanding exactly this kind of naïveté from the public at large.

So is climate gate a fraud? Is climate gate a scientific scandal? No. Climate gate is first and foremost a political scandal. More than that it is a global political scandal, that involves governments, media, institutionalize science, the banks, universities, indeed a vast cross-section of our ruling classes. It is more than a scandal; climate gate is a crime against humanity. And this is not an exaggeration. The goal of climategate was to extract money from every human being on planet Earth in exchange for a nonexistent salvation from a nonexistent threat. The goal of climate gate was to trick every human being on planet Earth into accepting the yoke of a global oligarchy with no more legitimate claim to power than those who ruled by divine right.

We are at a watershed moment. We may well see a transition to a new and better political structure for the entire world. But it will not be the one that has been designed for us. If nothing else the ability for government and media to lie to the population of the world on such a vast scale is forever destroyed. Climate gate will relegate all of the official stories of the governments of the United States and Great Britain and indeed every government that took part in the human cause global warming hoax to the same level of credibility as Ramses carvings showing his victory over the Hittites. It will be seen as an historic joke by future generations.

But we are not there yet. The forces that have enslaved us with deception and fraud and hoax are desperate to hang onto their power and authority. They are busy coming up with new hoaxes and frauds to scare us back into obedience. And the media well aware that they cannot report on the lies of climate gate without reporting their own complicity are working hand in glove with government to reassert their ability to control what you think and when you think it.

So, what we the free people of planet Earth need to do in the coming weeks is become the new mainstream media. The TV networks and other corporate media have been handed their marching orders to resell the illusion of human cause climate change in any way shape or form that will convince you to accept new taxes and the loss of your freedoms. The only way the rest of the world is going to find out about climate gate is if you tell them. Because the TV and news magazines won't. If it's mentioned at all, it will be to trivialize and dismiss it and assure the world it really doesn't matter. BBC is still reporting climate gate as just another computer crime. This is like reporting Watergate as just another burglary!

We have collected together a vast body of evidence calling into question the legitimacy of the claims of human cause global warming. We have collected together a vast body of evidence proving fraud and deception on the part of the global warming cult. Please for this information to everybody you know in times of the essence. Barack Obama as already indicated that he will not be swayed by the exposure of the fraud in the CRU/NWIA data, and fully intends to go to Copenhagen to sign away our national sovereignty as "penance" for our contribution to global warming.

Other observers have commented that the moment president Obama signs that Copenhagen Treaty his credibility as president of the United States will be destroyed. For him to sign away sovereignty of our nation on the basis of a known lie should enrage all Americans and make it clear that the federal government is not working in the interests of the American people any more, but in service to this emerging globalist socialistic empire. Remember; global government is what Hitler wanted. Global Government is what Napoleon wanted. Global Government is what Alexander the Great wanted. Global Government is what the Roman Caesars wanted.

Climategate may well prove to be the final fight in the war between those who would rule us with lies and those who wish to live with truth. Climategate makes it clear that yes, there really are massive conspiracies between government and the media to mislead the general public. You cannot pretend they don't exist; one is right there before you staked out naked on the ground, exposed for all to marvel at! I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide how many other such deceptions form what we think we know of the world and of history.

There are two paths into the future. Along one lies freedom and truth and prosperity for the people. Along the other lies a socialist dictatorship, born in deception, unable and unwilling to tolerate dissent, and dedicated to robbing the poor to give to the rich.

You need to decide which future you wish to live in.

And you need to decide what you will do about it.

see the entire article

This is a Street Brawl for Truth and Freedom

excerpt from Climategate: A Crime Against Humanity

by Mike Rivero

It is clear that government, the media, corporatized science, have quite literally bet the farm on selling the illusion of human cause global warming as justification for global taxes and global government. In order to bring about global government simultaneous with creating the illusion of a need they have to destroy the credibility of the regional governments and we have seen a great deal of this lately. Now the oligarchs face an awkward choice. They have set the stage for a collapse of the national governments and the global government they wish to install in its place may be collapsing right along with the myth of global government.

Various governments and the media are so heavily invested in selling the illusion of human cause global warming, that if that hoax is exposed, if the public becomes aware of the monstrous fraud involved, those institutions of government and media could very well be destroyed and by their own hands.

Already we are seeing the organizers and perpetrators of this fraud trying to limit the damage from this exposure in several ways. The media is already hard at work attempting to dump the blame and scandal solely on the climate scientists, who after all were only doing what they were paid to do. This is not to say the scientists are not guilty. Quite the contrary, they deserve to be pilloried publicly and humiliated for their betrayal of the public trust. To say that their careers should be ended is an understatement. But in our haste to punish the scientists who assisted in the lies to the world, we must not forget that the scientists were working for somebody; for politicians such as Al Gore, for an agenda called global government, and for those who wanted to get rich by selling is a fictitious product called carbon credit.

Yet another tactic being employed to limit the damage from climate gate, is to insist that even though the scientist responsible for the climate warming data have been exposed as holsters that the validity of the data itself must remain above question above reproach. This of course is nonsense. If you hire a contractor to build a home, and discover afterwards that the contractor has a history of using substandard materials and sloppy workmanship, do you continue to believe the home he has billed shoe is solid and durable and safe? Of course not. And yet the global warming cultists, are demanding exactly this kind of naïveté from the public at large.

So is climate gate a fraud? Is climate gate a scientific scandal? No. Climate gate is first and foremost a political scandal. More than that it is a global political scandal, that involves governments, media, institutionalize science, the banks, universities, indeed a vast cross-section of our ruling classes. It is more than a scandal; climate gate is a crime against humanity. And this is not an exaggeration. The goal of climategate was to extract money from every human being on planet Earth in exchange for a nonexistent salvation from a nonexistent threat. The goal of climate gate was to trick every human being on planet Earth into accepting the yoke of a global oligarchy with no more legitimate claim to power than those who ruled by divine right.

We are at a watershed moment. We may well see a transition to a new and better political structure for the entire world. But it will not be the one that has been designed for us. If nothing else the ability for government and media to lie to the population of the world on such a vast scale is forever destroyed. Climate gate will relegate all of the official stories of the governments of the United States and Great Britain and indeed every government that took part in the human cause global warming hoax to the same level of credibility as Ramses carvings showing his victory over the Hittites. It will be seen as an historic joke by future generations.

But we are not there yet. The forces that have enslaved us with deception and fraud and hoax are desperate to hang onto their power and authority. They are busy coming up with new hoaxes and frauds to scare us back into obedience. And the media well aware that they cannot report on the lies of climate gate without reporting their own complicity are working hand in glove with government to reassert their ability to control what you think and when you think it.

So, what we the free people of planet Earth need to do in the coming weeks is become the new mainstream media. The TV networks and other corporate media have been handed their marching orders to resell the illusion of human cause climate change in any way shape or form that will convince you to accept new taxes and the loss of your freedoms. The only way the rest of the world is going to find out about climate gate is if you tell them. Because the TV and news magazines won't. If it's mentioned at all, it will be to trivialize and dismiss it and assure the world it really doesn't matter. BBC is still reporting climate gate as just another computer crime. This is like reporting Watergate as just another burglary!

We have collected together a vast body of evidence calling into question the legitimacy of the claims of human cause global warming. We have collected together a vast body of evidence proving fraud and deception on the part of the global warming cult. Please for this information to everybody you know in times of the essence. Barack Obama as already indicated that he will not be swayed by the exposure of the fraud in the CRU/NWIA data, and fully intends to go to Copenhagen to sign away our national sovereignty as "penance" for our contribution to global warming.

Other observers have commented that the moment president Obama signs that Copenhagen Treaty his credibility as president of the United States will be destroyed. For him to sign away sovereignty of our nation on the basis of a known lie should enrage all Americans and make it clear that the federal government is not working in the interests of the American people any more, but in service to this emerging globalist socialistic empire. Remember; global government is what Hitler wanted. Global Government is what Napoleon wanted. Global Government is what Alexander the Great wanted. Global Government is what the Roman Caesars wanted.

Climategate may well prove to be the final fight in the war between those who would rule us with lies and those who wish to live with truth. Climategate makes it clear that yes, there really are massive conspiracies between government and the media to mislead the general public. You cannot pretend they don't exist; one is right there before you staked out naked on the ground, exposed for all to marvel at! I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide how many other such deceptions form what we think we know of the world and of history.

There are two paths into the future. Along one lies freedom and truth and prosperity for the people. Along the other lies a socialist dictatorship, born in deception, unable and unwilling to tolerate dissent, and dedicated to robbing the poor to give to the rich.

You need to decide which future you wish to live in.

And you need to decide what you will do about it.

see the entire article