destruction of the world

Friday, April 1, 2011

IDM 5.19 & IDM 6.04 | Download Serial Number IDM

IDM which stands for Internet Download Manager, which serves to mendawnload IDM Internet files with download speeds of almost 3 times faster than the download manually. IDM is a working system of dividing the file downloaded into several parts and downloading each file at the same time, allowing for files downloaded quickly.

IDM Software released a new version called IDM 6.04 to tersebarunya after successfully released version IDM 5.19. To download or upgrade IDM 6.04, you should make IDM Uninstall the old version first. After you uninstall, be sure to registry editor deleted the old IDM net in derektory C: \ Program Files \ Internet Download Manager.

After you ensure long IDM erased with clean, please restart the computer first before installing IDM 6.04.
Here's how to install the IDM program is:
• Install your IDM. (Prior to install, would that disable antivirus blockingnya system first)
• Close idm on the systray (on the bottom right corner near the clock)
• Copy the patch idm to C: \ Program Files \ Internet Download Manager. If the question you select Replace only
• Then click "idmreg"
• At this stage is complete and you have full version idm.

If you get a master CD that does not exist IDM IDM Crack it, please enter the Serial Number IDM. IDM in accordance with the master CD before you use the IDM software.

An Unsolicited Testimony of Reversing Cancer

Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:03 AM

To: Hom, Rosalina
Subject: I am a force to be reckoned with !!!!!

Dear Rosalina, My sweet friend! Thanks for this beautiful email. Your kind and alkaline words humble me and inspire me to continue with even more energy. Thank you so much for your very loving comments. We have much work to do! I’m glad to have teamed up with you. Hugs, RH

I want to tell you from the bottom of my heart how much I love you.

I so appreciate what you are teaching me. You have given me such an opportunity not just to save my own life but to save many others.

I have understood this biology from the beginning but after our talk yesterday and our call last night it really hit me like a ton of bricks. It hit me this morning as I was forwarding recipes to Julie and Ryan as I typed.....

We need to focus on the bowel......that is where it all begins. It takes 120 days to recycle our blood ( and I remember you telling me that and warning of that when I first started) You told me not to be disappointed if my blood was still dirty when I went to the doctor after being on the program for just 7 weeks. But it was. it was 50% better....... When I typed these words this morning.....Focusing on the bowel is why I have REVERSED my cancerous condition!!!!!!, I wasn't thinking about typing that.....it just flowed off my fingers to the keyboard........AWESOME !!!!

So lookout for those who dare ask me about my SuperGreens. There will be no dilly dally if you want my help!!!!!

I am FIRED UP!!!!!!

Love and Prayers, Linda

Sharpay's Fabulous Adventure (2011)

INFORMASI :
Sharpay's Fabulous Adventure

2011 | BRRip | XviD | 700 MB

Genre: Comedy, Drama, Family

English Review

Sharpay Evans travels to New York where she is pursuing a Broadway career but it's her dog who lands an acting gig first.

Sinopsis Indonesia

Sharpay Evans perjalanan ke New York dimana ia sedang mengejar karir Broadway tapi itu anjingnya yang tanah sebuah pertunjukan akting pertama.

Filesonic:
Download Part 1
Download Part 2
Download Part 3

One a Minute (2010) DVDRip

Info: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1489877/
Release Date: 6 October 2010
Genre: Drama
Cast: Kelly McGillis, Olivia Newton-John, Namrata Singh Gujral
Quality: DVDRip
Subtitle: Indonesia, English (N/A)

Sinopsis:

The film chronicles the diagnosis and treatment of a breast cancer survivor, interspersed with personal tales from famous international celebrities who are also survivors, or affected closely by cancer. 

Watch Trailer

Screenshot

Download EU

Join file dengan HJSplit

Download MF

Join file dengan HJSplit

ESSENTIAL KILLING

Dated Released : 22 October 2010
Quality : DVDRip
Info : imdb.com/title/tt1561768/
Country : Poland | Norway | Ireland | Hungary
Starring : Vincent Gallo, Emmanuelle Seigner, Zach Cohen
Genre : Thriller | War
----------------------------------------

The film tells the story of a man, captured in the desert by American forces, who finds himself transported to a nameless European country. He manages to escape into the vast frozen woodland, a world away from the desert home he knew. Forced into extreme survival mode, he must kill anyone who strays into his path.

Download File  [375MB-mkv]|maknyos

[subtitle menyusul]

Join filenya dg hjsplit, caranya baca di sini

Alternatif Link:

[DVDRip|375MB-mkv]|mediafire|password=cinema3satu
Download Files: part1 - part2 - part3
------------------------------------------
[DVDRip|375MB-mkv]|eu
Download Files: part1 - part2 - part3

Radioactive substances and effect on health

A man who has just returned from Japan gets checked for radiation levels.

Countries around the world have either banned or stepped up tests on imports from quake-stricken Japan after radioactive substances were found in its food and water following blasts at a nuclear plant.

Exposure to large amounts of radioactivity can cause nausea, vomiting, hair loss, diarrhea, hemorrhage, destruction of the intestinal lining, central nervous system damage, and death. It also causes DNA damage and raises the risk of cancer, particularly in young children and fetuses.

Below are the three radioactive substances health experts are most concerned about, the detected levels in Japan, and what they mean for human health:

IODINE-131

Leafy green vegetables in Japan were found this week to contain up to 22,000 becquerels of iodine-131 for every kilogram.

Such a level exceeds the limit set by the European Union by 11 times. Becquerel is a measure of radioactivity.

Eating a kilogram (slightly more than two pounds) of such vegetables would give half the amount of radiation typically received by the average person from the natural environment in a year.

Eating this amount every day for 45 days will accumulate 50 millisieverts, the annual radiation limit set for a nuclear plant worker. Millisievert quantifies the amount of radiation absorbed by human tissues.

Exposure to 100 millisieverts a year increases the risk of cancer. That is equivalent to about three whole body CT scans.

If inhaled or swallowed, iodine-131 concentrates in the thyroid gland and increases the risk of thyroid cancer. Children, fetuses and young adults are especially vulnerable.

The risk of thyroid cancer can be lowered by taking potassium iodide pills, which helps prevent the uptake of the radioactive iodine.

However, iodine-131 disintegrates relatively quickly and its radioactivity is halved every 8 days. This means it loses all its harmfulness in 80 days.

CESIUM-134 and CESIUM-137

Vegetables in Japan have also been tainted with up to 14,000 becquerels of cesium for every kilogram.

That exceeds the EU limit by over 11 times.

Eating a kilogram of such tainted vegetables every day for a month would accumulate radiation equivalent to a full body CT scan – or 20 millisieverts.

External exposure to large amounts of radioactive cesium can cause burns, acute radiation sickness and death. It can also increase the risk of cancer. Ingesting or inhaling cesium allows it to be distributed in soft tissues, especially muscle tissue, increasing cancer risk. It can also cause spasms, involuntary muscular contractions and infertility.

Unlike iodine, uptake of radioactive cesium cannot be prevented once the person is exposed.

This substance is of more concern than iodine-131 because it is very hardy and takes far longer to disintegrate.

Cesium-137 has a half life of 30 years, meaning it takes that long to reduce its radioactivity by half. It will take at least 240 years for this contaminant to exhaust all its radioactivity.

Cesium-134 has a half life of 2 years, which means it will take about 20 years for it to become harmless.

Below are the effects of short-term, high-level exposure to radiation, as published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike cancer, these effects from acute radiation exposure usually appear quickly, causing what is known as radiation sickness, which includes symptoms like nausea, hair loss and skin burns. If the dose is fatal, death usually occurs within two months.

- Exposure to 50-100 millisieverts: changes in blood chemistry.

- 500: nausea, within hours.

- 700: vomiting

- 750: hair loss, within 2-3 weeks

- 900: diarrhea

1,000: hemorrhage

- 4,000: possible death within 2 months, if no treatment

- 10,000: destruction of intestinal lining, internal bleeding and death within 1-2 weeks

-20,000: damage to the central nervous system and loss of consciousness within minutes, and death within hours or days.

The Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Crisis

The Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Crisis On March 11, a powerful, magnitude 9.0 quake hit northeastern Japan, triggering a tsunami with 10-meter-high waves that reached the U.S. west coast. Here's the science behind the disaster »

COUNTRY IN CRISIS: The March 11 earthquake and tsunami caused a nuclear crisis in Japan, but the effects are unlikely to spread to the U.S. Image: NASA/GSFC, MODIS Rapid Response

As the condition of the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in Japan continues to deteriorate, nuclear safety experts, government regulators and health physicists are keeping close watch on the situation to determine the danger—both real and hypothetical—that the incident poses to people near the plant.

Japanese authorities have carved the area around Fukushima into two zones, recommending that individuals within 20 kilometers of the plant evacuate and that anyone living 20 to 30 kilometers from the plant take shelter and stay put. Nevertheless, after initially supporting that action the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) took the dramatic step March 16 of recommending that Americans within 80 kilometers of Fukushima Daiichi evacuate the area.

U.S. federal guidelines set a much smaller standard perimeter for radiation hazards, leaving some puzzled as to why U.S. authorities would recommend such a large evacuation zone for Japan. (The 80-kilometer radius is larger than that implemented for the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in what is now Ukraine, after which 115,000 people were evacuated within roughly 30 kilometers of the nuclear site.) And although radiation measurements in the vicinity of Fukushima have varied greatly, it appears that exposures outside the 20-kilometer radius have not exceeded levels that would be cause for action in the U.S.

The differences in the responses of the U.S. and Japan to the crisis highlight the lack of detailed information on the rapidly shifting condition of the crippled nuclear plant, the inexact science of predicting what might happen next, and the difficulty of weighing the risks and benefits of taking various types of protective action.

The NRC's recommendation for a widespread evacuation stems not from the present conditions but from projected radiation exposures in a worst-case scenario, according to agency spokesperson David McIntyre. "Basically it was projections by our protective measures team based on what information we had available, what was going on at the plant, weather conditions, and so on," McIntyre says. "They projected into the short-term future and reached the conclusion that in the near term people out to 50 miles [80 kilometers] would exceed the exposure levels at which we would recommend action."

U.S. guidelines recommend protective measures, usually evacuation, if individuals are expected to receive 10 to 50 millisieverts (mSv) of radiation. (A sievert is a measure of ionizing radiation equal to 100 rems; a rem is a dosage unit of x-ray and gamma-ray radiation exposure; one millisievert is 0.1 rem.) The average American absorbs 6.2 mSv a year from natural and man-made radiation sources.

In the U.S. each nuclear power plant is surrounded by an "emergency planning zone," extending 16 kilometers in each direction, which would bear the brunt of radioactive fallout from a nuclear accident. The U.S. regulations are predicated on the assumption that most partial meltdowns would not expose individuals beyond 16 kilometers to dangerous radiation levels, and that even in worst-case accidents "immediate life-threatening doses would generally not occur outside the zone."

Outside the immediate vicinity of the nuclear site the primary danger is not radiation emitted directly from the plant as high-energy photons or other subatomic particles but airborne radioactive material released from a damaged reactor into an atmospheric plume. The material in that plume, as it undergoes radioactive decay, gives off dangerous radiation primarily in the form of gamma rays and can pose additional hazards if inhaled, swallowed or absorbed through the skin to emit radiation from inside the body.

"Internal exposure is very different than contamination you can walk away from," says Jerrold Bushberg, a health and medical physicist at the University of California, Davis. "If there's a plume that passes overhead and some of the material precipitates down, you may be externally contaminated, but it's nothing that a change of clothes and a shower can't take care of."

The "shelter in place" recommendation made by Japanese authorities for individuals between 20 and 30 kilometers from Fukushima Daiichi is intended to minimize ingestion of radioactive material and to prevent skin and clothing from becoming contaminated as the plume deposits radionuclides around the area.

So far, those precautions seem to be sufficient. "Those are appropriate actions to take to keep the dose to the population below one rem," or 10 mSv, says Richard Vetter, a professor emeritus of biophysics at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. "If the actions are taken and the doses are in fact lower than one rem, they will experience no health effects. There's a possibility to calculate a statistical increase in cancer in that population, but those are below the levels at which epidemiological studies have shown an effect."

The Japan Broadcasting Corp. (NHK) reported March 17 that measurements registered radiation levels of 0.17 millisievert per hour at one location 30 kilometers northwest of the site. Those levels were anomalously high—at most other locations the levels were roughly 1 percent to 10 percent that much—and would have to persist for 60 hours to deliver 10 mSv of radiation. "Currently the levels over there are not that concerning," Vetter says.

What is more, expanding the size of the evacuation zone can have its own liabilities. "When you evacuate people, you have to make a risk-informed decision," says Stephen Musolino, a health physicist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, N.Y. "Evacuation is not always the best way to avoid a radiation dose." Sheltering in place is a very effective form of protection, Musolino says, because moving farther from the accident site does not necessarily mean escaping the radioactive plume. "The plume is going to generally go in one direction unless there's a wind shift," he says. "You could evacuate into the plume."

The NRC's McIntyre says that the recommendation for additional evacuations in Japan is not incompatible with the standard 16-kilometer evacuation plan for a U.S. accident. "The 10-mile [16-kilometer] zone was always conceived as something that could be expanded as the situation warranted," he says. McIntyre notes that the NRC's shift—from publicly backing Japan's handling of the accident to publicly recommending a much stronger response—stems from the fact everyone is reliant on the Japanese authorities for accurate, up-to-date information on the situation. "Part of this is the difficulty in obtaining and assessing data. We're dependent on the Japanese for the data, pretty much," he says. "We're trying to get the information and assess it. Yesterday the information we had led our team to conclude that it was time to take action."

Patricia Milligan, a health physicist with the NRC's Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, says that the evacuation assessment was "based on the great uncertainty surrounding the situation," including "some of the issues with communications surrounding the event." The Japanese recommendation, she says, "was certainly appropriate. Ours is much more conservative."

Whether or not a turn for the worse at Fukushima Daiichi would endanger residents beyond 20 kilometers, individuals in Tokyo, some 200 kilometers from Fukushima Daiichi, appear safe; those in the U.S. are almost surely beyond danger. "Tokyo is certainly at risk of having some radionuclides blown over in a plume," Vetter says. "I don't think they would be of sufficient concentrations to cause problems." Bushberg of U.C. Davis says it would be very unlikely that Tokyo would see any substantial harm from radioactive plumes. "That's a pretty significant distance," he says.

As for the reported runs on potassium iodide—a drug that blocks the uptake into the thyroid gland of radioactive iodine from fallout plumes—on the U.S. west coast, "I think that's being a little unnecessarily cautious," says Edward Christman, a health physics consultant with Christman Cua Associates in Princeton, N.J., and an assistant clinical professor at Columbia University.

"It's certain that at the moment there is no concern whatsoever for the west coast or Hawaii, for that matter," Bushberg says. "It would be hard to imagine a release so catastrophic that it would endanger people on the west coast."

Vetter notes that sensitive monitoring equipment in the U.S. may in fact detect fallout from Japan, but the levels will be negligible from a human health standpoint. "It's inconceivable that we would have health effects in this country as a result of this accident," he says.