Another blog censored? ~ Ziofascism

Canadian blogger 'anachore' may have had his "Ziofacism" site shut down again.

How many times has this happened before, 3 or more?

Google cache still has the site here so that could mean there is a technical issue and it will be back soon ... or maybe not.

ZionistGoldReport reported on 'anachore' being taken down a couple of days ago.

Now please before anyone wants to comment and tries to tell us something they think we don't already know about anachore' ... we'll just say that in comments on other sites he was sometimes perceived as an arrogant pain in the butt prone to arguing/debating. He often called out others as 'hasbara' and he got the same accusations in return. Personally there was never a problem. Relatively speaking his blog never seemed all that 'dangerous' but some in Canada may have thought otherwise.  Perhaps some in the U.S. didn't like the Edgar J. Steele saga reports he had lately? Maybe it's something altogether different.


Censorship of free speech remains a top shelf issue with the internet as a battlefield. The snipers are out. The psyops is to sometimes go for just a wound, other times it's for the kill.

Another blog censored? ~ Ziofascism

Canadian blogger 'anachore' may have had his "Ziofacism" site shut down again.

How many times has this happened before, 3 or more?

Google cache still has the site here so that could mean there is a technical issue and it will be back soon ... or maybe not.

ZionistGoldReport reported on 'anachore' being taken down a couple of days ago.

Now please before anyone wants to comment and tries to tell us something they think we don't already know about anachore' ... we'll just say that in comments on other sites he was sometimes perceived as an arrogant pain in the butt prone to arguing/debating. He often called out others as 'hasbara' and he got the same accusations in return. Personally there was never a problem. Relatively speaking his blog never seemed all that 'dangerous' but some in Canada may have thought otherwise.  Perhaps some in the U.S. didn't like the Edgar J. Steele saga reports he had lately? Maybe it's something altogether different.


Censorship of free speech remains a top shelf issue with the internet as a battlefield. The snipers are out. The psyops is to sometimes go for just a wound, other times it's for the kill.

Censorship of blogs continues

 This time it's Incogman ....

 

This blog has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service.

Now I know that some will say "good riddance" or it was a "hasbara nest" or "racist" or a "psyops operation" or whatever. I've even taken flack for linking him on my blog roll. The bottom line is that no one was ever forced to go there and freedom always means taking or leaving whatever you please.

One question that came up several times was "why is this blog or that one taken down but Incogman remains?" That was never answered. Maybe IP's were being tracked, who knows.

When someone like Alex Jones gets something censored as what happened lately with his video 'Obama Deception,' I think "was this done to give credence to him, a part of the social engineering plan of deception?"

Maybe, maybe not.

What we do know is that there is sure a lot of talk about censoring the internet. Dual citizen traitors like Joe Lieberman are pushing for it. Some are even suggesting that we need a major false flag to get the ball rolling towards total control of what can or cannot be said in a public forum.

The powers that be want us to fear. They want us divided. They want us to be silent.

Censorship of blogs continues

 This time it's Incogman ....

 

This blog has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service.

Now I know that some will say "good riddance" or it was a "hasbara nest" or "racist" or a "psyops operation" or whatever. I've even taken flack for linking him on my blog roll. The bottom line is that no one was ever forced to go there and freedom always means taking or leaving whatever you please.

One question that came up several times was "why is this blog or that one taken down but Incogman remains?" That was never answered. Maybe IP's were being tracked, who knows.

When someone like Alex Jones gets something censored as what happened lately with his video 'Obama Deception,' I think "was this done to give credence to him, a part of the social engineering plan of deception?"

Maybe, maybe not.

What we do know is that there is sure a lot of talk about censoring the internet. Dual citizen traitors like Joe Lieberman are pushing for it. Some are even suggesting that we need a major false flag to get the ball rolling towards total control of what can or cannot be said in a public forum.

The powers that be want us to fear. They want us divided. They want us to be silent.

When Good Sites Censor

One of my favorite sites is Daily Paul. It's been an open forum and a very large one for those who appreciate freedom of speech. Always lots to agree and disagree with, just as open communication should  be.

But lately a couple of subjects have been seen to be divisive to the dialog. The owner of DP, Michael Nystrom, thinks it is in the best interests of his site to censor some of the most interesting and thought provoking posts concerning 9/11 and Israel.

To me these two issues, the false flag 9/11 and Israel's actions and influences, lie at the root of many of our current problems. Obviously many others at DP think so too judging by the threads there.  

Yeah, trolls/provocateurs are a problem at DP but that's everywhere and I've found if you just ignore them they'll go away. And if people don't like certain topics, well ... just ignore those too. It really should be a case of  'we're all on the same side here and no need to agonize over minor differences.'

What made DP relevant was it's diversity of topics and not being afraid to go down some less traveled paths as I thought the Paul message did.

Two of those paths are now seen to be divisive and not worthy of 'safe' consideration.

Sort of .... 'Gotta get our side's politicians elected and be more mainstream. Otherwise the big media may call us kooks and alienate potential voters. The political system can still work if we all agree.'

I'm not all that sure that tactic will work. All the truth as we know it at this moment should be told and debated.

Here's the latest DP thread on the topic of censoring.

Warning! Censoring topics will cause harm to the site and Movement.

Dear Michael,

There are uncountable number of throlls all over the internet whose job is to disrupt blogs and other websites, and get websites to censor themselves for negative mentions of Israel.

It is not easy to maintain the integrity of a site and still allow free discourse; I know that the throlls and shills will play both sides of the game to cause disruption till they cause the break of integrity and achieve censorship.

The Daily Paul already has good posting rules in place and only needs to enforce to ensure proper discussion of any topic. It does not need to censor negative discussion of just one county. Just imagine what doing that means!

The negative aspects of targeting just one country for censorship, are too many to mention. But from my experience there will be great disruptions to the site if you decide to unjustly target just one country.

The comments are varied  and telling. Mr. Nystrom responds:

Censoring is necessary in order to remain focused.

The mission of this site is to promote Ron Paul and his ideas.

Among these ideas are individual liberty.

911, and related topics tend to be divisive and take the community off message. 

Nystrom has all the right in the world to control his site as he wants. I just happen to think it's not in either his or the truth movement's best interests to limit the discourse. The Daily Paul should not be a garden variety alternative site to say, the Huffington Post. They censor the same topics there don't they.

~~~

Here's an article that was linked at the DP Sunday that got a lot of people going, both those sincere and the trolls. I guess it got a little too heavy and was censored. It may have been the so called 'straw that broke the camel's back.'

Israel Did 9/11, All the Proof You Need

When Good Sites Censor

One of my favorite sites is Daily Paul. It's been an open forum and a very large one for those who appreciate freedom of speech. Always lots to agree and disagree with, just as open communication should  be.

But lately a couple of subjects have been seen to be divisive to the dialog. The owner of DP, Michael Nystrom, thinks it is in the best interests of his site to censor some of the most interesting and thought provoking posts concerning 9/11 and Israel.

To me these two issues, the false flag 9/11 and Israel's actions and influences, lie at the root of many of our current problems. Obviously many others at DP think so too judging by the threads there.  

Yeah, trolls/provocateurs are a problem at DP but that's everywhere and I've found if you just ignore them they'll go away. And if people don't like certain topics, well ... just ignore those too. It really should be a case of  'we're all on the same side here and no need to agonize over minor differences.'

What made DP relevant was it's diversity of topics and not being afraid to go down some less traveled paths as I thought the Paul message did.

Two of those paths are now seen to be divisive and not worthy of 'safe' consideration.

Sort of .... 'Gotta get our side's politicians elected and be more mainstream. Otherwise the big media may call us kooks and alienate potential voters. The political system can still work if we all agree.'

I'm not all that sure that tactic will work. All the truth as we know it at this moment should be told and debated.

Here's the latest DP thread on the topic of censoring.

Warning! Censoring topics will cause harm to the site and Movement.

Dear Michael,

There are uncountable number of throlls all over the internet whose job is to disrupt blogs and other websites, and get websites to censor themselves for negative mentions of Israel.

It is not easy to maintain the integrity of a site and still allow free discourse; I know that the throlls and shills will play both sides of the game to cause disruption till they cause the break of integrity and achieve censorship.

The Daily Paul already has good posting rules in place and only needs to enforce to ensure proper discussion of any topic. It does not need to censor negative discussion of just one county. Just imagine what doing that means!

The negative aspects of targeting just one country for censorship, are too many to mention. But from my experience there will be great disruptions to the site if you decide to unjustly target just one country.

The comments are varied  and telling. Mr. Nystrom responds:

Censoring is necessary in order to remain focused.

The mission of this site is to promote Ron Paul and his ideas.

Among these ideas are individual liberty.

911, and related topics tend to be divisive and take the community off message. 

Nystrom has all the right in the world to control his site as he wants. I just happen to think it's not in either his or the truth movement's best interests to limit the discourse. The Daily Paul should not be a garden variety alternative site to say, the Huffington Post. They censor the same topics there don't they.

~~~

Here's an article that was linked at the DP Sunday that got a lot of people going, both those sincere and the trolls. I guess it got a little too heavy and was censored. It may have been the so called 'straw that broke the camel's back.'

Israel Did 9/11, All the Proof You Need