Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Afghanistan "Industrial-Strength Insurgency" Kills 21 U.S. Pawns in 48 Hours




As the press reports that Afghanistan bomb attacks kill twenty-one US soldiers in 48 hours ... David Petraeus describes the Taliban as if he is pitching a new and improved spray cleaner or laundry detergent; tough, 'industrial strength,' stronger than ever.

Does he make this stuff up on his own or have a PR team prepping him before interviews?

Petraeus definitely has certain talking points not to be deviated from ... lies to be exact ...
"We are here so that Afghanistan does not, once again, become a sanctuary for transnational extremists the way it was when Al Qaeda planned the 9/11 attacks."
Of course he throws a few truths into the mix to prepare us ...
Winning the war is a "long-term proposition."
Long-term as in forever or until the U.S. implodes, whichever comes first.


The general should have to go to the families of each of the these 21 who were wasted in the last two days and just tell them the truth.
 "No poppies are being hurt in this operation, the bankers are still making all the money and war contractors, including any possible future employers of mine, are doing just fine."
That way the grieving families would have a little bit better understanding of how the blood of their sons is keeping these 'too big to fail' institutions healthy and not have to fall back on old cliches like 'for our freedoms' or 'fight them there not here.'

Perhaps they'll just accept the reality and say ...
"My husband's dead and gone but JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs must also soldier on and GE is a brand I can trust!"

That aside, believe me on this. If you truly love a son or daughter, losing them is the worst thing in the world that can happen. Sometimes the loss is seemingly unavoidable. In the deceptions and lies of war there was always the possibility that you could have prevented it.
But for 21 young folks coming home in a box ... no one did.


--------------


The world is a maddening place. 
Now on the eve of another fake and hyped up Israeli/Palestinian peace talk, Israel kills 4 of their own in a false flag and puts the blame on Hamas. Israel doesn't want peace. They want more land, power and many more dead Palestinians ... and Iraqis, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Syrians, Lebanese  and of course Iranians.

Obama gives his Iraq war speech filled with lies. What else did you expect?
"Americans across the political spectrum supported the use of force against those who attacked us on 9/11."
al Qaeda is mentioned 6 times in this short teleprompter swill.

Islamophobia Rising ... satire as a weapon ...
Putting a Mosque Next to WTC-7 Is...BLASPHEMY!

We're all oil soaked Pelicans now ...
Zoriah Miller - Pictures of the Gulf Coast Disaster 

Afghanistan "Industrial-Strength Insurgency" Kills 21 U.S. Pawns in 48 Hours




As the press reports that Afghanistan bomb attacks kill twenty-one US soldiers in 48 hours ... David Petraeus describes the Taliban as if he is pitching a new and improved spray cleaner or laundry detergent; tough, 'industrial strength,' stronger than ever.

Does he make this stuff up on his own or have a PR team prepping him before interviews?

Petraeus definitely has certain talking points not to be deviated from ... lies to be exact ...
"We are here so that Afghanistan does not, once again, become a sanctuary for transnational extremists the way it was when Al Qaeda planned the 9/11 attacks."
Of course he throws a few truths into the mix to prepare us ...
Winning the war is a "long-term proposition."
Long-term as in forever or until the U.S. implodes, whichever comes first.


The general should have to go to the families of each of the these 21 who were wasted in the last two days and just tell them the truth.
 "No poppies are being hurt in this operation, the bankers are still making all the money and war contractors, including any possible future employers of mine, are doing just fine."
That way the grieving families would have a little bit better understanding of how the blood of their sons is keeping these 'too big to fail' institutions healthy and not have to fall back on old cliches like 'for our freedoms' or 'fight them there not here.'

Perhaps they'll just accept the reality and say ...
"My husband's dead and gone but JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs must also soldier on and GE is a brand I can trust!"

That aside, believe me on this. If you truly love a son or daughter, losing them is the worst thing in the world that can happen. Sometimes the loss is seemingly unavoidable. In the deceptions and lies of war there was always the possibility that you could have prevented it.
But for 21 young folks coming home in a box ... no one did.


--------------


The world is a maddening place. 
Now on the eve of another fake and hyped up Israeli/Palestinian peace talk, Israel kills 4 of their own in a false flag and puts the blame on Hamas. Israel doesn't want peace. They want more land, power and many more dead Palestinians ... and Iraqis, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Syrians, Lebanese  and of course Iranians.

Obama gives his Iraq war speech filled with lies. What else did you expect?
"Americans across the political spectrum supported the use of force against those who attacked us on 9/11."
al Qaeda is mentioned 6 times in this short teleprompter swill.

Islamophobia Rising ... satire as a weapon ...
Putting a Mosque Next to WTC-7 Is...BLASPHEMY!

We're all oil soaked Pelicans now ...
Zoriah Miller - Pictures of the Gulf Coast Disaster 

I bought some new books.

I just ordered Christina Hoff Summer's books:

Who Stole Feminism
The War Against Boys

I ordered them, because I understand that they are excellent references that refute many male-bashing claims.

If anybody out there can recommend other books that REFUTE MALE-BASHING CLAIMS - please let me know.

Thanks.

Dear God 2.0 The Roots

I would rather only deal with music that moves me.This is a perfect example


mixi.jp/home.pl
peacedenimco.compeacedenimco.blogspot.com
us.cyworld.com/peacedenimco

The Formula for Failure and Success by Jim Rohn



Failure is not a single, cataclysmic event. We do not fail overnight. Failure is the inevitable result of an accumulation of poor thinking and poor choices. To put it more simply, failure is nothing more than a few errors in judgment repeated every day.

Now why would someone make an error in judgment and then be so foolish as to repeat it every day? The answer is because he or she does not think that it matters.

On their own, our daily acts do not seem that important. A minor oversight, a poor decision, or a wasted hour generally doesn't result in an instant and measurable impact. More often than not, we escape any immediate consequences of our deeds.

If we have not bothered to read a single book in the past ninety days, this lack of discipline does not seem to have any immediate impact on our lives. And since nothing drastic happened to us after the first ninety days, we repeat this error in judgment for another ninety days, and on and on it goes. Why? Because it doesn't seem to matter. And herein lies the great danger. Far worse than not reading the books is not even realizing that it matters!

Those who eat too many of the wrong foods are contributing to a future health problem, but the joy of the moment overshadows the consequence of the future. It does not seem to matter. Those who smoke too much or drink too much go on making these poor choices year after year after year... because it doesn't seem to matter. But the pain and regret of these errors in judgment have only been delayed for a future time. Consequences are seldom instant; instead, they accumulate until the inevitable day of reckoning finally arrives and the price must be paid for our poor choices—choices that didn't seem to matter.

Failure's most dangerous attribute is its subtlety. In the short term those little errors don't seem to make any difference. We do not seem to be failing. In fact, sometimes these accumulated errors in judgment occur throughout a period of great joy and prosperity in our lives. Since nothing terrible happens to us, since there are no instant consequences to capture our attention, we simply drift from one day to the next, repeating the errors, thinking the wrong thoughts, listening to the wrong voices and making the wrong choices. The sky did not fall in on us yesterday; therefore the act was probably harmless. Since it seemed to have no measurable consequence, it is probably safe to repeat.

But we must become better educated than that!

If at the end of the day when we made our first error in judgment the sky had fallen in on us, we undoubtedly would have taken immediate steps to ensure that the act would never be repeated. Like the child who places his hand on a hot burner despite his parents' warnings, we would have had an instantaneous experience accompanying our error in judgment.

Unfortunately, failure does not shout out its warnings as our parents once did. This is why it is imperative to refine our philosophy in order to be able to make better choices. With a powerful, personal philosophy guiding our every step, we become more aware of our errors in judgment and more aware that each error really does matter.

Now here is the great news. Just like the formula for failure, the formula for success is easy to follow: It's a few simple disciplines practiced every day.

Now here is an interesting question worth pondering: How can we change the errors in the formula for failure into the disciplines required in the formula for success? The answer is by making the future an important part of our current philosophy.

Both success and failure involve future consequences, namely the inevitable rewards or unavoidable regrets resulting from past activities. If this is true, why don't more people take time to ponder the future? The answer is simple: They are so caught up in the current moment that it doesn't seem to matter. The problems and the rewards of today are so absorbing to some human beings that they never pause long enough to think about tomorrow.

But what if we did develop a new discipline to take just a few minutes every day to look a little further down the road? We would then be able to foresee the impending consequences of our current conduct. Armed with that valuable information, we would be able to take the necessary action to change our errors into new success-oriented disciplines. In other words, by disciplining ourselves to see the future in advance, we would be able to change our thinking, amend our errors and develop new habits to replace the old.

One of the exciting things about the formula for success—a few simple disciplines practiced every day—is that the results are almost immediate. As we voluntarily change daily errors into daily disciplines, we experience positive results in a very short period of time. When we change our diet, our health improves noticeably in just a few weeks. When we start exercising, we feel a new vitality almost immediately. When we begin reading, we experience a growing awareness and a new level of self-confidence. Whatever new discipline we begin to practice daily will produce exciting results that will drive us to become even better at developing new disciplines.

The real magic of new disciplines is that they will cause us to amend our thinking. If we were to start today to read the books, keep a journal, attend the classes, listen more and observe more, then today would be the first day of a new life leading to a better future. If we were to start today to try harder, and in every way make a conscious and consistent effort to change subtle and deadly errors into constructive and rewarding disciplines, we would never again settle for a life of existence—not once we have tasted the fruits of a life of substance!


Regards,

Ferdy D.Savio

Monday, August 30, 2010

A Big List of Male-Bashing LIES, DECEPTIONS and FALSEHOODS!

What follows is a list of lies, falsehoods and deceptions that in my opinion have either poisoned women's minds with hatred of men or pedestalized women.

I hope that anybody reading this will CONTRIBUTE to the list - because I am sure that I missed quite a few!

Wife-beating is a major cause of birth defects

Domestic Violence is most common in Marriages

The Majority of Stalkers are Men

Feminism Liberated Women

150000 Women Die Each Year From Anorexia

The Lady Justice Statue

Men are Afraid of Intimacy

Men Have a Hard Time Expressing Their Feelings

Men are Afraid of Commitment

Labeling Certain Ads as Degrading to Women

In Older Times, Women were not Allowed to have Careers

The Passing of V.A.W.A.

Men and Women must Register for Selective Services

Only Men Start Wars

30% of Yearly Hospital Visits by Women are because of Domestic Violence

Women Only Commit Domestic Violence in Self-Defense

Flood of Public Service Announcements and Commercials Pertaining to Domestic Violence

False Accusations of Domestic Abuse are Rare

False Accusations of Rape are Rare

Three Lies about Rape

The 'Rule of Thumb'

25% of Women will be Raped While Attending College

Women Earn 75 cents for Each Dollar a Man Earns for doing the SAME WORK

A 'Nice Guy' is a self-serving whiny manipulative man

Female Virgins are 'Pure'

Flood of Levitra, Cialis, and Viagra Commercials

In Older Times, Women were not Allowed to get College Degrees

The Reason Women Wear Makeup is to Cover Up Bruises from their Domestically Violent Male Partners

The Reason Men ask Women to Shave 'downstairs' is because they fantasize about having sex with children

LIE: Feminism Liberated Women, or Empowered Them


This statement is just laughable. Women have always held jobs, got educations, or done what they want. The one exception might be the right to vote - however, the voting right was always about CLASS and not gender - as originally it was restricted to landowners. In addition, it wasn't feminists that gave women the right to vote - it was MEN.

TRUTH:
Feminism has made it so that most women are now FORCED to work whether they want to or not.

That is, because of the dual income household, the price of houses and automobiles exploded in the 80's. This means that there are very few men earning enough money to give women the FREEDOM to be a housewife.

This has not given women MORE freedom, it has taken freedom away from women.

Common sense prevails as well. Get out and meet today's women. Most of them are taking strong head medications, lead stressful lives as they juggle raising kids and career, carry spite and malice towards the opposite sex in an attempt to blame men rather than themselves for their stress, and hence have unsatisfying love-lives as well. The list goes on.

This is not LIBERATION. This is the exact opposite of LIBERATION!

BRAINWASHING:
Since women will see feminism as their liberator, anybody criticizing it or condemning it will instantly be labeled as a "woman hater" (i.e. what kind of a monster wants to enslave women right?).
This has effectively painted most modern women into a corner of hostility and irrationality.

LIE: 150,000 women die each year of starvation in America simply because they are trying to be thin and attractive to men.

This is a funny one:

Feminists have claimed that 150,000 women DIE each year because of anorexia.

The actual figures of deaths per year FROM ALL EATING DISORDERS can be obtained from this link:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/infosheets/infosheet_eatingbehaviors.pdf

It states quite clearly that in 2002 there were 159 deaths where an eating disorder was either the PRIMARY cause of death, or a contributing factor of death.
In 2003, 147 deaths.
in 2004, 161 deaths.
in 2005, 134 deaths.
In a 4-year period, that is a total of 601 deaths from ALL EATING DISORDERS in a 4-year period.
You would have to multiply that number by 250 to get the 150,000 that the feminist's claim.

Binge Eating Disorder - overeating - this is the most common eating disorder.
Bulimia Nervosa - cycle of over-eating, induced vomiting, under-eating. 2nd most common
Anorexia Nervosa - under-eating - 3rd most common eating disorder!

Here is where it gets funny:

How did the feminists come up with 150,000 per year?
Here is a quote from http://fathersforlife.org/health/anorexia8.htm

"I called the American Anorexia and Bulimia Association and spoke to Dr. Diane Mickley, its president. 'We were misquoted,' she said. In a 1985 newsletter the association had referred to 150,000 to 200,000 'sufferers' not 'fatalities' of anorexia nervosa."

This means that her research concluded 150,000 to 200,000 CASES of anorexia per year. Her research was misquoted as being 150,000 to 200,000 FATALITIES per year.

It is disgusting how feminist's misquote actual research to install fear and hatred in people.

BRAINWASHING:
Women will believe that women are being brainwashed - not to hate men, but rather to cater to them. Indeed, women will think that society forces women to be so "hell bent for leather" to look absolutely perfect that there is actually an epidemic of starvation in a land of plenty.

This causes women to be even less compliant with men - and more antagonizing. Since they believe that so many women are actually starving themselves to death just to appeal to men, they feel that THEY are the ones that are the "disposable sex".

This in turn will also make them less compliant sexually with men - as they now believe that women's health is viewed by society as expendable for a man's sexual appetite. The grim fact is, men are viewed as expendable - and their sexuality - is viewed as repugnant. B.S. like this factoid helps to make male sexuality more repugnant in the eyes of women.

DECEPTION: The Lady Justice Statue

Lady JusticeLady Feminazi

Ever wonder why justice in this country is constantly MISS-represented as a statue of a woman? I don't. In this country, there is a serious misconception about women. That they are all very pure and innocent. Being so pure and innocent - they of course have a much greater sense of justice don't they?

NOT!



TRUTH:
Looking at our country today, and speaking to women, you'll see that women typically have no sense of justice whatsoever. Brain-washed by idiotic talk-shows like Geraldo Rivera, Ricky Lake and Oprah, justice to them is not something to be worked through with logic and evidence. It is something to be worked through with emotions and opinions.

BRAINWASHING:
"I am woman - I can do no wrong!"
Since justice is MISS-represented as being a woman, many women have a greater sense of entitlement to who is right and who is wrong. This makes them seriously dysfunctional in relationships - they will callously brush truth and logic aside, and argue their over-emotional outbursts with undue passion. All because they have a sense of entitlement to being more "just" then their male counterparts.

LIE: Men are Afraid of Intimacy

Show me the study - there isn't one.

TRUTH:
Intimacy is not the problem: women are. Again, this statement conveniently leaves out 50% of the equation - women.
It would be more accurate to say, "Men are afraid of being intimate with the wrong woman". We will not hear this however, because it would hold women accountable - something that is not tolerated in our society.

BRAINWASHING:
This gives women a sense of hopelessness in establishing a relationship with a man.
Of course, if they do establish a relationship, anything that goes wrong will always be the man's fault - since they are the ones with all the flaws.

LIE: Men have a Hard Time Expressing Their Feelings

Show me the study. More B.S. from various talk-show hosts, and bimbo's who got degrees in psychology in Mexico!

TRUTH:
This is merely a way for women to invalidate the feelings that the men in their lives have in order to not have to deal with them. That is, it is much easier to be in a relationship with an uncaring and unemotional person, than not.
Why?
To admit that the people around have feelings is to admit that you can affect those feelings. This would require women to be held accountable for their actions - something most refuse to do.

BRAINWASHING:
Men's feelings are invalidated. This results in a princess like syndrome: "My feelings are the only ones that matter".
This is why many women today are nothing short of emotional terrorists.

LIE: Men are Afraid of Commitment

Some women, feminists, men, pseudo-psychologists and many other people in the media all claim that men are afraid of commitment.

TRUTH
This statement is jack-assed. Men are not afraid of commitment. Men are afraid of being committed to the WRONG woman.Modern Marriage

With the over-whelming majority of women in this country being brain-washed on a daily basis to hate them, that equates to pretty much any woman being the WRONG woman.
Modern Marriage
Ultimately, this means that men are afraid of women - or more specifically, what women in this country have become - whether they are aware of it or not.
Modern Marriage
Everyday, there are more and more women taking medications for extreme mental and emotional disorders. Everyday, there are more and more man-hate filled slogans filling stores. Everyday, there are more and more male-bashings on T.V.

Even a complete idiot would be afraid of committing himself to a woman that has been brain-washed to hate him for being what he is.

More truth reveals that women initiate over 66% of divorces. Women are even more prone to file for a divorce if there are children in the relationship.

With that being true, it seems that women are more afraid of commitment than men.

BRAINWASHING:
As always, women are blameless.

We do not say that men are afraid of hate-filled modern women.

No, we say they are afraid of commitment.

As I mentioned, the statement is jack-assed. It removes all responsibility from women.

If its true that men are afraid of commitment, then guess what - something must be wrong with the women they have to be committed to.

DECEPTION: Labelling Certain Ads as being Objectifying or Degrading to Women

HOT!
Many feminists and others claim that many T.V. commercials, bill-boards, and other media are degrading or disrespectful to women because they hyper-sexualize them, or portray them as sex-objects.HOT!
Such ads range from women's lingerie, to fast food commercials. A scantily clad woman is shown, or a woman is shown in a sexually suggestive position or context.

TRUTH
Sex sells. Whether or not such commercials are effective or appropriate is not the issue here.
Example: Showing a woman in a sexually suggestive position to advertise a new type of spatula may be a questionable advertising tactic, but it does not warrant censorship simply because it is sexually suggestive.

Showing a well-formed woman scantily clad or even naked is not degrading to women. The only things that are truly degrading to women are the actions of other women.

If anything, such ads are exploiting and degrading to the male sex drive.HOT!
By showing half-naked women to sell products, they are in fact exploiting a man's natural desire for women, that is, they are exploiting the man's sex-drive.
HOT!
BRAINWASHING:
Male heterosexuality is vilified, demonized, and exploited - all under the guise of women being the ones who are exploited.
Men getting sexually aroused by the sight of an attractive or sexually suggestive woman is a NORMAL MALE SEXUAL RESPONSE.

To suggest otherwise is bigoted and childish.

By labeling such things as degrading or disrespectful to women, they are labeling the male sex response as degrading or disrespectful to women.

COMMON SENSE WILL PREVAIL
Using images of healthy, attractive people is a commonplace advertising tactic. If showing a well-formed women is "objectifying" to them, then showing a well-formed man must be just as bad.

Where does the line get drawn?

If we show a picture of a dog eating some dog food, we are being degrading to dogs, shamelessly showing them all as being "eating objects".

This attitude obviously came from some very warped minds. One has to wonder why the male sex response is such a threat to them. Or, why healthy and attractive people are seen by them as something that must be censored.

DOUBLE STANDARD:
Billboards that show half-naked men are of course, not degrading or objectifying to men. Even images that are seriously derogatory to men are not labeled as being such.

LIE: In Older Times, Women Were not Allowed to have Careers

The erroneous belief that in days past, women were not allowed to have careers, or be part of the workforce.
Modern Housewife
TRUTH
I personally did research on this. I found a few examples of women that were doctors and dentists in the 1800's:

First Female Dentist
Female Doctor Born in 1892
Female Doctor in 1884

This was difficult to research, but I did not find any evidence that the women listed above were persecuted in anyway for the careers that they chose. I also found no evidence that they were outcasts of society.
I also found no evidence of any laws that existed that prevented women from holding careers.

BRAINWASHING:
Young women will now believe that in addition to receiving beatings with sticks no bigger around than thumbs, they were also not allowed to get jobs.

And of course, what is it that liberated women? Feminism of course (or women's liberation).

This will convince women that hating men (or becoming a feminist) is the way to gain independence.

NOTE:
This also disproves the lie that "Women were not allowed to earn college degrees" - as doctors and dentists are professions requiring higher education.

DECEPTION: Passing of the "Violence Against Women Act"

The details of what this "act" does are irrelevant. Its very title suggests that there is so much violence against women in our country that such a law is necessary.Hillary Clinton
TRUTH
For every woman who is the victim of a violent crime, there are three men that are victims of violent crimes.

Women initiate domestic violence against their partners just slightly more than men do.

From the CDC website:
This states that about 25% of relationships will experience violence.
Of those, 50% are reciprocally violent (both partners are violent).
50% are non-reciprocally violent (only one partner is violent).
of the non-reciprocally violent relationships, the women is the agressor 70% of the time.

I will do the math:

Of 100 people, 25 will experience violence.
12.5 will be in reciprocally violent relationships - 6.25 will be men, 6.25 will be women.
12.5 will be in non-reciprocally violent relationships.
70% of those the women is the violent one - 0.7 * 12.5 = 8.75.
30% of those the man is the violent one - 0.3 * 12.5 = 3.75.
Now, we add the women - 6.25 + 8.75 = 15.0.
Then, we add the men - 3.75 + 6.25 = 10.0.
This means that for every 10 violent men, there are 15 violent women in relationships.




BRAINWASHING:
The existence of such a sexist law accomplishes a few things:

It cheapens violence that is aimed at men. I.E. since a law exists prohibiting violence against women but not men, violence aimed at men must be a lesser crime.
It's very existence implies that violence against women is commonplace.
It places women's citizenship above men's citizenship. Something akin to the "Ku Klux Klan" passing a "Violence Against White People Act".
The passing of bigoted laws is acceptable when it's in the favor of women.
Again, a seed of distrust is placed in women against men. At the same time, it is perfectly acceptable to cheapen men and their rights and citizenship status to 2nd class.

LIE: Both Men and Women must Register for Selective Services

feminism is fascism
TRUTH:
Only MEN are required to register for selective services.

Feminists would like everybody to believe that they are fighting for equality. The fact that they do not complain about inequality in their favor shows that equality is NOT their agenda.

The grim fact is, selective services was about the only "unfair" law at the time that women's liberation started.

BRAINWASHING:
By convincing women that feminism and women's liberation stand for equality - and not injustice - young women are more tempted to join such organizations.

Also, they convince young women that feminism and women's liberation are not hate movements, but rather, stand for equality.

LIE: Only Men have to Register for Selective Services because only Men Start Wars

No study has ever been done to support this fact. It is female bigotry at its worst.

TRUTH:
Both sexes start wars.
Women have contributed as much to war as they have to science, medicine, literature or anything else.
76% of women supported the Gulf War invasion.
87% of men supported the Gulf War invasion.
Women leaders (i.e. politicians) have supported wars.
Women have sat on draft boards.
Women have publicly shamed men who refused to go to war by giving them a white feather as a sign of their 'unmanliness' during the White Feather Campaign.


BRAINWASHING:
By convincing people that only men start wars, it further demonizes men in the eyes of women. It also helps to enforce other wrong-headed statements about domestic violence and rape.

In addition to this, it wrongly places total innocence on women - the mere statement itself argues that women do not start wars.

LIE: 30% of Yearly Hospital Visits by Women are the Result of Domestic Violence

This is a damning statistic to men. It says that men are so abusive that almost a third of the women that are sent to the hospital each year are there because men are violent animals.

Feminists enjoy using this statistic. There are many other statistics derived from this one; such as:
[X] women are sent to the Hospital every [Y] seconds...

TRUTH:
This statistic was REMOVED FROM the FHHS (Federal Heath and Human Services) in 2005. When the FHHS tried to determine where the statistic came from in the first place, they couldn't!

The CDC (Center for Disease Control) now claims that ALL forms of physical violence account for about 3% of yearly hospital visits. This means that domestic violence must account for less than 3%.

The CDC claims that automobile accidents and even animal attacks are more prevalent than domestic violence.

BRAINWASHING:
With such a damning statistic (a wrong one) in the hands of feminists, they have placed another seed of distrust in women against men. Women will now believe that there is no shortage of men who commit acts of violence against women. Again, they demonize men in the eyes of women by placing lies in schools and in the media.

False statistics like this one are what helped to convince people to pass V.A.W.A. (The Violence Against Women Act). V.A.W.A. is a clearly sexist law that states that in any domestic violence situation, when a phone call is made, the man must be arrested.

Of course, such a law is OUTRAGEOUSLY sexist, yet, it got passed - with no objections from women who claimed themselves to be "fighting for equality". Men helped pass this law too. There is no sane man who would not be shocked by the 30% statistic listed above - shocked enough into believing that such a sexist law is necessary.

The feminists have used this false statistic to install a sense of fear in women, and guilt in men. That fear and guilt boiled to such an extent that INEQUALITY IN THE LAW was the result.

Very effective hate-mongering tactics indeed. To have so many people so brain-washed as to pass a sexist law against men - all in the names of equality and justice...

LIE: Women only Commit Domestic Violence in Self-Defense

This statement was purely speculative and had no basis in fact. All credible studies that have been done on this topic show that women are just as violent as men, and, they commit acts of violence against their partners for the same reasons as men.
Man Hater

TRUTH:
Women commit domestic violence for the same reasons that men do.
In a study, men and women both gave the same reasons for assaulting their partners. The most common reason was, "to get through to them".
(Carrado, "Aggression in British Heterosexual Relationships; A Descriptive Analysis," Aggressive Behavior, (1996) 22: 401-415.)

BRAINWASHING:
Women cannot do any wrong. It is assumed that any violence a woman commits is in self-defense.
This further demonizes men too, as since the domestic violence women commit is in self-defense, it means that the man must have initiated the violence.

DECEPTION: The Constant Flood of Domestic Violence Commercials and Public Service Announcements that Portray Demonizing Stereotypes of Men and Wrong-H

If you watch any domestic violence video, in commercial form, or even a police training video, you'll notice that the information presented is incorrect, and the man is ALWAYS marked as the villain.

TRUTH:

Women commit domestic violence for the same reasons that men do.
In a study, men and women both gave the same reasons for assaulting their partners. The most common reason was, "to get through to them".
(Carrado, "Aggression in British Heterosexual Relationships; A Descriptive Analysis," Aggressive Behavior, (1996) 22: 401-415.)

BRAINWASHING:
By showing only violent men, and no violent or hysterical women on such ads, they are painting a warped picture of men being monsters and women being saints.

This instills fear and mistrust of men in women.

Since no abusive women are shown in such videos, it re-inforces the "I am woman, I can do no wrong" attitude.

MY SEARCH ON YOUTUBE
Well, I did a search on YOUTUBE for "Domestic Violence". Below are the search results. Each one show:

Whether or not an angry or violent man was shown or implied.
Whether or not an angry or violent woman was shown or implied.
Whether or not a beaten man was shown or implied.
Whether or not a beaten woman was shown or implied.
I also tried to identify which ones had FALSE or MISLEADING statistics in them.


VIEWSYouTubeDescriptionAngry ManAngry WomanBeaten ManBeaten WomanFalse Stats
285,977LINKAustralian man hands another man a bat!YesNoNoNoNo
58,993LINKMovie clip with Farrah FaucetYesNoNoYesNo
13,432LINKMusic with pictures of beaten womenNoNoNoYesNo
70,279LINKRapper on Domestic ViolenceYesNoNoYesNo
258,322LINKWaitress spills coffee on a man.YesNoNoYesNo
28,755LINKA Woman leaves an abusive relationship.YesNoNoYesNo
513,969LINKClip from a movie.YesNoNoYesNo
10,464LINKA Woman crying...YesNoNoYesYes
7,722LINKMusic Video?????
33,675LINKMovie Clip - a man abusing a womanYesNoNoYesNo
???LINKSet of Videos about Female ViolenceNoNoNoNoNo
2,848LINKPanel Discussion about Domestic Violence on Children?????
1,573LINKTwo Women talk about Getting Beat UpYesNoNoYesNo
3,917LINKVarious ImagesYesNoNoYesNo
23,809LINKIslamic Sermon about Domestic ViolenceNoNoNoNoNo
58,533LINKPatrick Stewart Domestic ViolenceYesNoNoYesYes
???LINKLink to Series of Public Service Announcements?????
46,325LINKMedia Hype about Rhianna/Chris BrownYesNoNoYesNo
4,694LINKText PresentationNoNoNoNoYes
110,929LINKA Child's Tea PartyYesNoNoYesNo
31,387LINKShows a beaten womanNoNoNoYesNo
1,712LINKOne Woman's StoryYesNoNoYesNo
6,242LINKWOW! A Men's Rights Group Sues!NoNoYesNoNo
16,087LINKNear the end - Its talks about Domestic ViolenceYesNoNoYesNo
76,118LINKInterview with a WomanYesNoNoYesYes
9,835LINKA Man Getting HitNoYesYesNoNo
4,694LINKIdentical to the one above with 4,694 views.NoNoNoNoYes
217LINKA Seminar - all female speakers.?????
4,596LINKSea-Lion Domestic Violence.NoNoNoNoNo
19,280LINKA Fair Approach.YesYesYesYesYes
19,047LINKShows Violent Men.YesNoNoYesNo
11,906LINKOnly shows Violence against women.YesNoNoYesNo
5,607LINKImages of Beaten Women.NoNoNoYesNo
6,071LINKSome more False statistics...NoNoNoNoYes
2,110LINKMore images of Beaten Women...NoNoNoYesNo
8,134LINKGay Men Domestic Violence Polar Plunge???????
5,883LINKStory of a woman in India.YesNoNoYesNo
6,511LINKMemorial for a Woman.YesNoNoYesNo
TOTAL2123246

Here are the stats:

55%Show or imply an angry or violent man.
5%Show or imply an angry or violent woman.
8%Show or imply a man getting hit.
63%Show or imply a woman getting hit.


And - 18% Have FALSE or MISLEADING statistics!
The problem is, just over 50% of all Domestic Violence is perpetrated by WOMEN!
One thing in particular I noticed: Most videos almost literally show a woman with a halo above her head, and a man wearing demon horns. That is, mis-leading stereotypes of both men and women were being shown in the videos - deragotory ones for men, excessively positive ones for women. Also, the videos rarely showed an argument leading up to violence. Most simply implied that men just hit women for no reason whatsoever. And of course, women never hit men.

Talk about mis-representation!

LIE: False Accusations of Domestic Violence or Child Abuse are Rare

Measuring false accusations is very difficult. This statement NEVER had any basis in fact. There was no credible study that was done to support this false-fact. It was purely speculative, yet it has been taken as gospel in our society.

TRUTH:
During divorce proceedings, false accusations of domestic violence, child abuse, or restraining order abuse, are common.

Men can be arrested, jailed, restricted from the homes, or restricted from their bank accounts WITHOUT DUE PROCESS

More than 50% of child sexual abuse allegations are unsubstantiated.
(Eckenrode, Powers, "Substantiation of child abuse and neglect reports, Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psych., 1998, 56, 9-16; Lewis, "Reliability rather than zealotry," Summer 1996, Kentucky Bench & Bar, 60, 23-30.)

Women who falsely accuse men of such things are RARELY prosecuted.

BRAINWASHING
Women can do no wrong. Anything a woman says must be taken as an absolute truth.

LIE: False Accusations of Rape are Rare or Non-Existant

Measuring false accusations is very difficult. This statement NEVER had any basis in fact. There was no credible study that was done to support this false-fact. It was purely speculative, yet it has been taken as gospel in our society.

TRUTH:
Almost every month, a man is cleared of rape charges after having been imprisoned for years - due to DNA testing.

A study conducted by the United States Air-Force found that more than 25% of women who accused men of rape recanted their story just before taking, or after FAILING a lie-detector test.
Ultimately, the study concluded that 60% of rape allegations were FALSE.
The most common reason for the false accusations from women were spite or revenge.
(Forensic Science Digest, v. 11. n. 4, 12/85; Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1994, v. 23, n. 1.)

BRAINWASHING:
Women are as usual, blameless for their actions. A crime as serious as rape is used as a tool for getting revenge against boyfriends or spouses that they could not control.

Rape is a serious crime, so accusations of it are taken seriously (as they should be). However, small-minded women use such crimes to falsely accuse men for their own petty and selfish reasons.
They do so without any fear of persecution, since the U.S.A. has made such a witch hunt out of rape allegations.

LIES: Three Lies About Rape

Men are 10 Times more likely to Rape than a Woman is to Falsely Accuse a Man of Rape.

For Every 10 Women Who are Raped, only 1 Reports the Rape to the Police.

False Rape Accusations are Rare, if not non-existent.

TRUTH:
Let's do the math:

Lets say we have 10 women who have been raped, and 10 men who did the raping.

1 of those women will report the crime to police.

Since men are 10 times more likely to rape than women are to falsely accuse a man of rape - there are 10 rapists above, so there must be one false accuser.

One FALSE accuser, and ONE legitimate accuser.

By their own hate-filled, mentally warped statistics, this means that 50% of rape accusations are FALSE.

BRAINWASHING:
Why not just say something like, "Boys are 10 times as smelly as girls". The statements are not only FALSE, they are just childish.

When hearing rape statistics, women will now multiply the number they hear (erroneously), by 10. This grossly exaggerates the crime, and will install fear and paranoia of men in women.

When women hear things like, 25% of women will be raped by the time they enter college, they will figure that most of those women did not report the crime, so its actually somewhere around 250% that will have been raped by the time they enter college, or - each women will have been raped approximately 2.5 times by the time they enter college.

LIE: The Phrase 'Rule of Thumb' Pertains to Archaic Wife-Beating Laws.

There is a feminist teaching, still going on in our schools today. The phrase, "RULE OF THUMB" originated from an old wife-beating term. That is, it was illegal to beat your wife with any stick that was bigger around than your thumb.

This phrase is widely used - by an unprecedented number of people.

TRUTH
Please visit WIKIPEDIA. Here is a quote from what it has to say about "RULE OF THUMB":

The earliest citation comes from Sir William Hope’s The Compleat Fencing-Master, second edition, 1692, page 157: "What he doth, he doth by rule of thumb, and not by art." The term is thought to originate with wood workers who used the length of their thumbs rather than rulers for measuring things, cementing its modern use as an imprecise yet reliable and convenient standard.
...
...
It is often claimed that the term originally referred to a law that limited the maximum thickness of a stick with which it was permissible for a man to beat his wife, but this has been discredited.

BRAINWASHING:
What the feminists have done, is take a very common phrase, and twisted it to mean something slanderous towards men. That is, they have erroneously placed wife-beating into a large portion of the population's mouths.

In doing so, they have "commonized" wife-beating, and cheapened (actually erased) the fact that it has always been frowned upon in western cultures. That is, since so many people use the phrase, "rule of thumb", they have put a seed into the minds of young women that people have no resentment towards wife-beaters.

They have placed the lie into people's minds that wife-beating was so common, and so acceptable, that people actually regulated wife-beating - and - it was so common, that a common phrase has been passed down for dozens of generations because of the commonplace of wife-beating.

LIE: 25% of Women will be Raped While Attending College

TRUTH:
This false fact was derived at by a study done by Ms. Magazine. The researcher Mary Koss was hand-picked by a feminist, "Gloria Steinem". Mary Koss has admitted that 73% of the young women she counted as rape victims were not aware that they had been raped.

Let's do the math:

25% of women raped - only 27% legitimately raped

That's 0.25 * 0.27 = 0.0675 or 6.75% legitimately raped.

That is, instead of 25% of women in college having been rape victims, there were only 6.75% that had been rape victims.

Furthermore, Mary Koss has also admitted that 43% of those young women surveyed were continuing to date the man that raped them.

I would say that is another 43% that is baloney, so, 57% of the already 6.75%:

0.57 * 0.0675 = 0.038475 or 3.8475% (lets round it up to 3.85%).

OK, now, instead of 25% of the women in college having been rape victims, only 3.85% have been raped.

Instead of ONE of every FOUR, it is more like ONE of every TWENTY-FIVE. That means that in a crowd of 100 women, only about 4 have been the victim of rape.

Rape is a crime of hate, not passion. It is a very violent act, and can result in the death of the victim. In order to properly handle it as a crime, proper research should be conducted by level headed people.

By allowing fanatics and lunatics pass hysteria and exaggerated statistics, the problem will only get worse.

BRAINWASHING:
By placing this type of statistic into young women's minds, they are convincing them that they have a 25% change of being raped - while in college. They are also convincing young women that most men must be rapists. Since so much effort is taken to arrest MEN for raping women, there must be an awful lot of men out there who rape women.

What this does to young men: Most men are not rapists - rape is a hate crime. Men are not typically hateful of women. The truth is, Men are curious about women, and want to get to know them - yes, for sex - it is an awful lot of fun and it is what propagates our species. This will convince young men that most men are rapists, and most women will be victimized by them. They will in fact be overly eager to prove to young women that they are not bad-people - to such an extent of over-doing it, and coming across as being feminine and not masculine.

LIE: Women Earn $0.75 for each $1.00 a Man Earns for doing the SAME WORK

A recent study conducted of CEO's (both men and women), showed that Women CEO's earned slightly more than Men CEO's.

TRUTH:
The study came from a "snapshot" of all full-time employed people. It does not take into account experience, education, occupation, or hours worked each week - to name a few. When more accurate studies are done by economists, the "wage gap" vanishes.

Here is some reading material to back that up:

Women's Figures: An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in America, by Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Christine Stolba, published by the Independent Women's Forum and the American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C. 2000.


COMMON SENSE WILL PREVAIL
If it were true that women earn less for doing the same work, corporations would hire only women. This is true for several reasons:

They would cut their employee costs by 25%
They would be fulfilling their affirmative action quota
Many corporations are RUN by women these days - not MEN - the sexist argument, "It's a Man's World" is NO LONGER VALID
Corporations are ruthless business machines. They do not care about gender, only hiring the best people, and paying them as little as possible
Based on the reasons above, it is obvious that the statement, "Women Earn Less For Doing the Same Work" is an incorrect one.

BRAINWASHING:
Two political candidates in the 2008 Presidential Election, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, both used this LIE to further their campaign. That is, they promised to voters to rectify the so-called "wage-gap".

The fact that this statement of theirs was taken so seriously, demonstrates how many people in the American population believe this LIE - eventhough common sense prevails over it (as well as credible studies).

Ask yourself: How would you feel if you were told over and over again that you would get paid less than somebody of a different race - simply because of they way our society is set up?

The result of this lie is more hatred and distrust installed in women, aimed at men.

LIE: A 'Nice Guy' is a Whiny Self-Serving Manipulative Man

Feminist Mother
Feminists (and others) claim that a "nice-guy" is actually a self-serving, whiny, manipulative man that attributes his lack of success with women to his self-proclaimed kindness.

TRUTH:
From a standard Dictionary:

Nice: -adjective, nic -er, nic -est
1. pleasing; agreeable; delightful: a nice visit.
2. amiably pleasant; kind: They are always nice to strangers.

Guy: -noun
1. Informal. A man or a boy; fellow: He's a nice guy.

So, a "Nice Guy" is a pleasing, agreeable, delightful man or boy.

WHAT HAPPENED??
Upon hearing the phrase, "nice guys finish last", the feminists (and others) decided to pervert the term "nice guy" to mean something derogatory.

Just like "Rule of Thumb", the feminists have taken a common phrase, and perverted it to mean something that is demonizing to men.

Instead of meaning a pleasing, agreeable, delightful man or boy, they have decided that a "nice guy" is actually a self-serving, whining, manipulative man who claims that his lack of success with women is due to his self-proclaimed kindness.

The perversion in action:
MAN: I'd like you to meet Bill, he is a real nice guy.
WOMAN: No thanks, I have met enough self-serving, whining, manipulative men already.

The funny thing is: To discredit the phrase, "nice guys finish last" would not be terribly difficult, simply conduct a study:

Clearly define what behaviors and character traits qualify as "nice".
Find a random sample of men.
Clearly define what qualifies as being "successful with women".
Determine which men are "nice" and which are not.
Compare the intimate habits of the "nice" men with the other men.
To the best of my knowledge, no such study has ever been done.
Lack of research does not stop feminism!

Rather than conduct a study to validate or invalidate the phrase, "nice guys finish last", the feminists have decided to pervert the English language.

Maybe the phrase is true?

BRAINWASHING:
Whether it is true or not is irrelevant, a "nice guy" is a pleasing, agreeable, delightful man or boy.

You can find examples of the perversion in action at:
heartless-bitches - Be sure to read through the whole section - notice the contradictions and flagrant misuse of the term "nice"!

AND manhood101 - no, you are not hallucinating!

The fact that there are two web-pages, run by supposedly different people, show that this nonsense is being taught in schools - most likely college campuses.
When the word "nice" is used before the word "guy" it now means something derogatory. When it is used before any other word, "nice times", "nice woman", "nice dog", "nice meal"... it means something positive. When it is used before "guy" it is bad.

FALSEHOOD: Female Virgins Somehow Represent "Purity"


This attitude towards female virgins may not be prevalent in our society today, but the attitude has certainly left its mark on our culture.

We have all heard this before, or at least something like it. If women that are virgins are "pure", then women who have engaged in sexual intercourse must be "NOT PURE". That is, the act of sex makes them "not pure".

Any person having this mentality would also have to believe that a man makes women impure by having sex with them. A man must be "defiling" a woman when he has sex with her - since he is changing her from a pure to impure state.

TRUTH:
How Pure are Female Virgins Anyway?

Well, are prostitutes pure?

Here is a story about a female virgin who auctioned her virginity off on E-Bay

This woman is a virgin, and yet she has the MENTALITY of a prostitute. And - any feminazi's reading this - she is a women's studies major.

The belief that a female virgin is somehow "pure" is nonsense to begin with. Unless, we accept the prostitute mentality as also being a "pure" one.

Being a female virgin is NOT a prerequisite for any of the following:

Not having a bad attitude towards men.
Not having herpes.
Not smelling bad or having bad hygiene.
Not having impure thoughts about sex.
Not being a prostitute (no first costumer!).
Not having a raunchy skin-rash.
Not being a total bitch.
I can go on forever here... The belief is INCORRECT!

BRAINWASHING:
Male sexuality is labeled as being "disrespectful" to women. Since it defiles them - or changes them from being "pure" to "not pure".

Women and Men are raised believing that male sexuality is disrespectful to women. Men feel guilty about normal sexual desires. Women believe that they are being disrespected when a man approaches them sexually. This has a second effect as well: when men are constantly shot down (usually in a very rude manner) when approaching women in a sexual manner, feelings of anger can arise in the man, and subconscious feelings of guilt in the women (for acting belligerently towards a normal function of our species).

DOUBLE STANDARD:
MALE VIRGINS are not considered "pure", but nerdy, inadequate, inept etc...

Our society is putting halo's above women, and either demon horns on men or just ridiculing them.

DECEPTION: Constant flood of Levitra, Viagra and Cialis Commercials


These are all products that supposedly help a man to get an erection if he has "erectile dysfunction disorder" or EDD.

TRUTH:
Very few men will actually suffer from this disorder. I have read articles that claim that less than 1% of men will ever experience EDD.

The typical reasons for men not being able to get erections are:

Lack of exercise
Poor Diet
Lack of interest
Boredom with sex-life
Psychological issues

BRAINWASHING:
Women are blameless. They can now claim that their husband or partner has EDD, instead of blaming themselves.

Even men will not admit that their partner is a turn-off because she believes that his sex-drive is disrespectful of women.

A woman who chronically nags her husband will most likely end up with a very uninterested man in her life, not one with EDD. The same thing applies to those women who:

have no self-control when it comes to their temper
have no self-control over their emotional states during menopause or P.M.S.
have no control over their loud shrilly voice

The list goes on of course...

LIE: In Older Times, Women Were not Allowed to get College Educations

The erroneous belief that in days past, women were not allowed to obtain college degrees.



TRUTH:
In the 1930's, 30% of all college degrees were obtained by women.

In doing my own research, I found no evidence that any laws existed that forbid women from earning college degrees.

I also found no evidence that women who held degrees were imprisoned or persecuted in anyway.


BRAINWASHING:
Young women will believe that all men want uneducated dumb-bells. This can have the effect of women purposely acting stupid to attract men.

It also places more distrust of men in women.

And, as is typical, feminism or women's liberation is seen as the "force" that allowed women to suddenly earn college degrees.

LIE: The Reason Women Started Wearing Makeup was to Cover Up Bruises Caused by Their Domestically Violent Male Partners.

What some people are saying here, is that men are naturally violent towards women. Women must cover up constant bruising because men are always beating them (or at least used to always beat them). That wearing of makeup has now become a tradition in our society.

This statement has no merit.

TRUTH:
Women wear makeup to make themselves appear more attractive, or to be more satisfied with their appearance.
The injuries women sustain during domestic violence will not be covered up by foundation and blush.

BRAINWASHING:

This lie convinces women that men are inherently violent towards women.

LIE: The Reason Some Men Ask Women to Shave Their Vaginas is because They Fantasize About Having Sex with Children

This statement is an excellent example of how some women will form the most negative and derogatory opinions of men - without any proper investigation being conducted.

I have spoken to men about this.

Some people are shocked and offended when sex-acts are described in detail. If you are one of those people, stop reading.

.
.
.
.
TRUTH:

The men I spoke to said that when performing oral sex on a woman, her pubic hairs always get in the way - they said it is hard to keep all the hair out of the way - it ends up in their mouth (yuck). That is why they like their women to shave (or at least trim) downstairs.

It has nothing to do with a sexual desire for children.

BRAINWASHING:

This lie effectively convinces women that quite a few men are secretly pedophiles. This demonizes male sexuality (and women's sexuality too I suppose).

The only unsinkable ship is FRIENDSHIP ♥



































Oh, can't you see the big smile? Sincerely, Im so so happy today. Dan semuanya disebabkan KAWAN - KAWAN aku yang gila camera. :D Dulu rasa tak sabar nak habis sekolah tetapi sekarang rasa sedih pulak nak tinggalkan sekolah dan berpisah dengan kawan2. Only a few months left. :(

Semua gambar ini di'capture' pada hari kemerdekaan, tapi gambar kami je lebih. :D Ada beratus - ratus keping gambar dalam memory card dan ini hanya sebahagian. Seperti biasa, more picture is downloaded in my Facebook. Sila tatapi sentuhan photography Fara Hazman dan sedikit touch-up dari Cerra Azlan :D *a picture paints a thousand words :)