No Mr. Biden, Dick Cheney is not a fine fellow

And neither are you Joe ...











Both Biden and Cheney are creepy war mongering liars whose degenerate pubic displays in the media are continuing signs of the decline of America sinking further and further into a criminal state.

Cheney's words on torture yesterday are clear reminders that he and many others from the Bush syndicate should be indicted for crimes against humanity. I'd say he misses those regular torture tape viewings from gitmo and elsewhere.

Backers of the Cheney endorsement on torture are still beating the drums for more ... if necessary.

"Let's take your hypothesis a bit further. We have captured a terrorist, but he is a hardened character. We cannot be certain that he will crack in time. We have also captured his wife and children".

Torture the wife and children.
{more}

What should be happening here is taking place in Spain today.

On Monday February 15 in Madrid, Judge Baltasar Garzon will convene an investigation of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity allegedly committed by U.S. government officials and others during the Bush administration.

The first witness called to testify will reportedly be American international human rights lawyer Dr. William F. Pepper. Dr. Pepper, who convened the International Human Rights Seminar at Oxford University, stated that he was, “asked by the Court to file an Opinion and testify as an expert on the issue of jurisdiction of the Spanish Court with respect to the various crimes being alleged.” He may also testify as to his opinion on the validity, or invalidity, of the most likely defenses to be offered by defendants should criminal charges result, namely ‘Sovereign Immunity’ and ‘Superior Orders’ (more commonly known as ‘The Nuremberg Defense’).

In his Opinion submitted to the Court last spring, Pepper concluded:

“… from the U.S. government’s own documents and the public statements of its leaders, that there is prima facie evidence of the following crimes:

• 
  
  • Torture and the Conspiracy to Commit Torture
  • War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
  • Waging Aggressive War
  • Illegal (Arbitrary) Detention

[He] places varying degrees of responsibility on particular government officials including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney and dismisses as inapplicable to serious international crimes the relevant defenses available to them and their subordinates including the government lawyers who [he argues] have a special professional responsibility.”

He further concluded that the Spanish Court, “is fully able and obligated …under international law and Universal Jurisdiction” to prosecute if the evidence indicates that prosecutions are legally justified.
{more - The Desperate Blogger}

Cheney never misses an opportunity to hype the CIA/Mossad Al Qaida creation. On ABC he says:

... the situation with respect to Al Qaida to say that, you know, that was a big attack we had on 9/11, but it's not likely again, I just think that's dead wrong. I think the biggest strategic threat the United States faces today is the possibility of another 9/11 with a nuclear weapon or a biological agent of some kind, and I think Al Qaida is out there even as we meet trying to figure out how to do that.

Being out of office, Cheney would have a hard time being an integral part of another false flag as he was on 9/11. I really think he misses that. Biden is a sociopath but not quite the psychopath that Cheney is so it's doubtful he would play much of a role in an attack on the U.S. He would be a big part of the cover up if it happened.

Cheney's world view may play in Peoria but in other places there is much doubt on exactly what happened on 9/11 as evidenced by the growing foreign media acceptance of questioning the official story.

From Elizabeth Woodworth at Global Research:

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account.

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.

This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country's foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge. {more}

Cheney undoubtedly thinks he is beyond prosecution. Many a criminal also live in this delusion. Obama, Biden and Hillary Clinton included.

Dennis Kucinich summed it all up for both the current and past administrations:

“We have a 'gangsta' presidency and a Congress that isn’t any better.”